I’ve been quietly building software for brokerage firms for the last few months… looking for 3-5 design partners to tell me everything that’s wrong with it
Hey r/businessbrokers. I’d rather get torched in this sub than read another LinkedIn post about AI for M&A. Here’s the pitch, then the ask.
What I built. It’s called Kyndir. The cleanest way to describe it is the agent-first operating system for SMB brokerage firms. Every workflow between the first Fathom call and the closing wire happens inside one chat-driven product instead of across a CRM, a BOV spreadsheet, a generic AI tab, an e-sign tool, and a Word CIM template. Eight modules: contacts and nurturing, sellability and BOV, marketing, pipeline, engagement letters, onboarding, listings and CIM, buyer flow.
The bet I’m making, and the one I want you to argue with. A horizontal CRM with a brokerage skin doesn’t actually run a deal. The work that takes a broker’s day isn’t CRM work. It’s drafting a BOV. Generating a CIM. Watching a seller’s inbox for documents that need filing. Drafting buyer Q&A from a 200 page data room. None of that lives inside the database. So I built the layer that does it, and I made the chat the surface.
Specifically, today, it does this.
Native Fathom integration plus a long list of other API connections, so the agent has real context. It reads call transcripts, email threads, document drops, and prior firm activity, then turns that context into work product instead of a meeting summary nobody opens twice.
Generates every asset a brokerage actually ships. Teaser. Blind profile. Full Confidential Information Memorandum. Financial summary. Channel-specific listing copy. Engagement letter. Buyer Q&A response. All against your firm’s templates and your firm’s tone.
Scores sellability against your firm’s rubric. Eight default drivers, editable weights, custom drivers, versioned per industry. Run the scoring on the 60 to 80 percent of seller leads brokers reject today, and build a 12 to 18 month value enhancement plan instead of walking away.
Produces a defensible Broker’s Opinion of Value across EBITDA multiple, DCF, and revenue multiple methodologies. Typically in under a minute. You review before anything leaves the firm.
AI-led buyer Q&A. When a buyer asks something through the data room, the agent drafts an answer pulling from the documents and prior Q&A, then routes it to you for approval, edit, or escalation. A 3 broker firm runs buyer flow at the bandwidth that used to require a junior associate per deal.
Email watching, scoped, read-only, opt-in. The seller’s Q3 P&L hits your inbox, gets named correctly, files into the deal record, broker notified. Multiply by twenty onboarding items and a multi-week back and forth becomes a one-week structured intake.
Surfaces aging deals before they stall, against your firm’s cadence rules.
The whole point of running it this way is that a small firm can stay small. The agents handle the work that scaled firms hire associates and admin to do. The broker stays in approval, not production.
What I’m asking for. 3 to 5 design partner firms. Solo broker through about 10 brokers. Willing to run it on a real deal and tell me everything that’s broken, stupid, or missing. Founding pricing, real say in the roadmap, no annual lock-in.
I’d rather build the right product with 3 firms than the wrong product with 30.
Site’s at kyndir.com if you want the longer pitch.
Comment or DM if you’re interested. Happy to take questions, including “Khaled, this sounds like every other pitch we’ve heard.”
Khaled, founder