The contractor billing $250/hour works 12 hours a week. He's more productive than every full-time engineer on the team
We hired a contractor to help with a backend migration. His rate was $250/hour. He billed roughly 12 hours a week. The CFO flagged it during a review: "Why are we paying someone $13K a month for part-time work?"
I pulled the numbers. In his first month he closed 34 tickets. The average full-time engineer on the same team closed 19. He didn't attend standup. He wasn't in Slack during business hours. He never went to retro or sprint planning. He just read the tickets, shipped code, and left
His code quality was consistently above average. Fewer revision requests than anyone except our most senior IC. He never introduced a regression in 6 months of work
At one point someone asked him to join the daily standup "for visibility." He said no. He said he'd rather spend that 15 minutes writing code and that he'd send an async update at the end of his working block instead
Management eventually decided not to renew his contract. The reason given was "cultural misalignment." The real reason was that he made a room full of full-time engineers with equity and benefits look slow by comparison, and it was uncomfortable for everyone involved
He now works for our competitor. Same rate. Same hours. Their loss metrics went up after he left. Ours went down