u/This_Calligrapher426

Namaskaram Everyone,

This is Anandmitra, I have been developing some foundational quantum concepts. I need good, fair and logical criticism to do better. Please comment and review. I have shared the links of published papers:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20376621
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32536965

This work presents a unified geometric framework for quantum reality through four interconnected papers. It proposes that the coherent, non-separable correlations described by Hilbert space originate from an unobservable Energy Space, a fundamental substrate beyond spacetime that preserves perfect coherence and all conservation laws, thereby providing a geometric interpretation of quantum entanglement. Within this framework, the relation E = hf is interpreted as an encoding relation rather than a statement of physical energy actualization. During measurement, structural branching may occur, but Energy Space ensures that only one geometrically valid branch undergoes physical localization. Spacetime emerges from Energy Space as a passive geometric medium with intrinsic dynamic capabilities, giving rise to quantum objects and their interactions.

Quantum objects are interpreted as dynamic geometric patterns of spacetime possessing an encoded geometric identity. Their physical properties, including mass, charge, spin, momentum, energy, wavelength, and phase, are fundamentally encoded in Energy Space and become physically actualized according to the interaction context and the degree of coherence or decoherence. The stability, transformation, and propagation of quantum objects are determined by their geometric compatibility with spacetime and with other quantum geometries.

Electromagnetic, weak, and strong interactions are interpreted as direct interactions between compatible quantum-object geometries, whereas gravity is regarded as an indirect geometric interaction mediated through spacetime geometry. Geometric interactions may produce superposition, transformation into new quantum-object geometries, or the formation of larger composite geometric structures, providing a unified geometric interpretation of interactions, confinement, and composite systems.

Within this geometric framework, a recursive geometric scaling parameter satisfying the invariant relation is proposed. Based on this hierarchy, phenomenological recursive scaling relations are developed for the lepton and quark families, suggesting a possible underlying geometric structure governing fermion masses, generational hierarchy, and relative stability.

Finally, the Peak-Coupling Theory proposes that quantum localization and decoherence occur through discrete peak-coupling events between interacting quantum geometries at oscillatory extrema within a quantum wave packet. The wave envelope and phase continuously modulate the distribution of possible coupling events, while observable interaction probabilities may emerge from the squared magnitude of local coupling amplitudes, providing a possible geometric route toward the emergence of Born-rule probabilities.

Together, these four papers present a unified conceptual framework in which Energy Space, spacetime, quantum objects, physical interactions, particle hierarchies, quantum measurement, and localization are interpreted as interconnected manifestations of an underlying geometric reality.

I will appreciate your responses.

Thanks!

Anandmitra

Namaskaram Everyone!

I am Anand (Anandmitra). Over the past few years I have been developing a conceptual framework on quantum objects, spacetime, and their interactions. I have recently posted my papers here:

https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32536965

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20564644

Some of the key ideas I explore are:

• Quantum objects are dynamic geometric structures rather than fundamental particles in the conventional sense.

• Physical properties are not continuously manifested. Instead, they become physically realized during interactions, while prior to interaction they exist as encoded dynamic structures.

• I explore the possibility that spacetime is not empty nothingness but a subtle medium that participates in physical processes.

• I explore the possibility that spacetime itself emerges from a more fundamental, dimensionless "Energy Space," where the mathematical structure of Hilbert space may be relevant.

• What we describe through fields may reflect deeper geometric interactions between dynamic quantum structures.

At present these ideas are conceptual and qualitative. I am still working toward a more complete mathematical formulation.

There are many aspects that could be discussed, but I would like to start with the most fundamental one: the concept of Energy Space.

Do you see similarities between these ideas and any existing approaches in quantum foundations? Are there major conceptual difficulties or objections that immediately come to mind?

I would genuinely appreciate constructive criticism and discussion.

Thank you,

Anandmitra