I built a tool that turns a photo of a math worksheet into a full lesson plan — sharing on a Saturday per the self-promo rule
Lesson planning was the thing I kept hearing about from teachers: the material already exists, the worksheet, the textbook page, the district packet, but turning it into an actual lesson (objective, warm-up, guided practice, differentiation, exit ticket) is what eats the evening.
So I built Scaffold. You take a photo of the worksheet and about a minute later you get a complete lesson plan built around that specific material: objective, hook, direct instruction, guided practice, assessment, differentiation (support and extension), and a short quiz. It aligns to CCSS-M when a standard applies, and it tells you honestly when one doesn't instead of inventing a citation.
Yes, it's AI, so let me answer the obvious question up front: how is this different from pasting into ChatGPT? Two ways. It starts from your actual material rather than a prompt you have to engineer, and it returns a structured, classroom-ready plan instead of a wall of text. You should still read and edit it the way you'd read anything a student teacher handed you, the point is starting at 80% instead of a blank page.
You can try it on one worksheet with no account (it shows you the real output before asking you to sign up), and the free plan is 10 lessons a month, no card.
What I'd genuinely love from this sub: try to break it. Handwritten problem sets, proof-based geometry, weird district curricula, I want to know where it falls apart before more teachers rely on it.