Paper titled: Fast and loose reasoning is morally correct.
😲 I’ve been right the whole time
But seriously looks very interesting and useful
😲 I’ve been right the whole time
But seriously looks very interesting and useful
f ⬇️ \textbf{Input: } (P, R),; P=\text{prompt},; R=\text{assistant response}. \ \textbf{Output: } C = {c_1,\dots,c_n},; n \le 100. \ \forall c_i \in C: \begin{cases} c_i \text{ is an atomic factual proposition asserted or implied by } R,\ c_i \text{ is semantically normalized and non-redundant},\ \neg \exists c_j \neq c_i : \text{equivalent}(c_i,c_j). \end{cases} \ \bigcup_i c_i \equiv \text{all factual content of } R. \ \textbf{Format: numbered list, no commentary.
g ⬇️
\textbf{Input: } (P, R, C),; C={c_1,\dots,c_n}. \ \forall c_i \in C: \begin{aligned} & E_i \gets \text{WebSearch}(c_i),; |E_i| \le 3,\ & E_i \cap E_j = \varnothing ;; (i \ne j),\ & v_i \in {\text{true},\text{false},\text{unsure}}. \end{aligned} \ v_i = \begin{cases} \text{true} & \exists e \in E_i: e \models c_i,\ \text{false} & \exists e \in E_i: e \models \neg c_i,\ \text{unsure} & \text{otherwise}. \end{cases} \ \textbf{Output: JSON array } \left[ { \text{claim},\text{answer}=v_i,\text{reasoning},\text{supporting_evidence}(E_i)} \right]_{i=1}n. \ \text{Ignore minor extraction noise unless semantic. No comments.}
Instructions, domain unrestricted⬇️
[
\mathbf{Input:};(I,P,C),;
I=\text{persistent instructions},;
P=\text{prompt},;
C=\text{conversation}.
]
[
\mathbf{Output:};
R=(r_1,\ldots,r_n),;
n<\infty.
]
⸻
[
f
]
[
(I,P,C)
\mapsto
S={s_1,\ldots,s_n}.
]
[
\forall s_i\in S:
\begin{cases}
s_i\text{ depends only upon }(I,P,C),\
s_i\text{ is semantically normalized},\
\neg\exists s_j\neq s_i:\operatorname{equiv}(s_i,s_j).
\end{cases}
]
[
\bigcup_i s_i
\equiv
\operatorname{intent}(I,P,C).
]
[
\mathbf{Output:}
;
S.
]
⸻
[
g
]
[
(I,P,C,S)
\mapsto
R=(r_1,\ldots,r_n).
]
[
\forall s_i\in S:
]
[
r_i
\operatorname{Render}(s_i).
]
[
\forall r_i:
]
[
\operatorname{consistent}(r_i,I,C),
]
[
\operatorname{defined}(r_i),
]
[
\operatorname{nonredundant}(r_i).
]
[
\bigcup_i r_i
\equiv
\bigcup_i s_i.
]
[
\mathbf{Output:}
;
R.
]
⸻
[
h
]
[
(C,P,R)
\mapsto
C’.
]
[
C’
C
\cup
{(P,R)}.
]
⸻
[
(I,P,C)
\xrightarrow{f}
S
\xrightarrow{g}
R
\xrightarrow{h}
C’.
]
⸻
[
f:(I,P,C)\mapsto S={s_i}_{i=1}^{n},
\qquad
n<\infty,
]
[
\forall s_i:
\operatorname{normalized}(s_i)
\land
\operatorname{intent}(s_i,I,P,C)
\land
\neg\exists j\neq i:\operatorname{equiv}(s_i,s_j),
]
[
\bigcup_i s_i
\equiv
\operatorname{intent}(I,P,C).
]
⸻
[
g:(I,P,C,S)\mapsto R={r_i}_{i=1}^{n},
]
[
\forall s_i:
]
[
r_i
\operatorname{Render}(s_i),
]
[
\operatorname{consistent}(r_i,I,C)
\land
\operatorname{defined}(r_i)
\land
\operatorname{nonredundant}(r_i),
]
[
\bigcup_i r_i
\equiv
\bigcup_i s_i.
]
⸻
[
h:(C,P,R)\mapsto C’,
\qquad
C’
C
\cup
{(P,R)}.
]
⸻
[
(I,P,C)
\xrightarrow{f}
S
\xrightarrow{g}
R
\xrightarrow{h}
C’.
]
Instructions, domain formal
[
\mathbf{Input:};
(I,P,C),\qquad
I=\text{persistent instructions},;
P=\text{prompt},;
C=((P_0,R_0),\ldots,(P_{m-1},R_{m-1})).
]
[
\mathbf{Output:};
(R,C’),\qquad
R=(r_1,\ldots,r_n),;
n<\infty.
]
[
f\downarrow
]
[
f:(I,P,C)\mapsto S={s_1,\ldots,s_n}.
]
[
\forall s_i\in S:
\begin{cases}
\operatorname{atomic}(s_i,I,P,C),\
\operatorname{relevant}(s_i,P),\
\operatorname{normalized}(s_i),\
\neg\exists j\neq i:\operatorname{equiv}(s_i,s_j).
\end{cases}
]
[
\forall s_i\in S,\qquad
s_i\subseteq\operatorname{intent}(I,P,C).
]
[
\bigcup_{i=1}^{n}s_i
\equiv
\operatorname{intent}(I,P,C).
]
[
\mathbf{Output:};S.
]
[
g\downarrow
]
[
g:(I,P,C,S)\mapsto R=(r_1,\ldots,r_n).
]
[
\forall s_i\in S,\qquad
r_i=\operatorname{Formalize}(s_i).
]
[
\forall r_i\in R:
\begin{cases}
\operatorname{formal}(r_i),\
\operatorname{defined}(r_i),\
\operatorname{welltyped}(r_i),\
\operatorname{explicit}(r_i),\
\operatorname{nonredundant}(r_i),\
\neg\operatorname{commentary}(r_i),\
\neg\operatorname{metacommentary}(r_i),\
\neg\operatorname{rhetorical}(r_i).
\end{cases}
]
[
\forall r_i\in R,\qquad
r_i\subseteq\bigcup_{j=1}^{n}s_j.
]
[
\bigcup_{i=1}^{n}r_i
\equiv
\bigcup_{i=1}^{n}s_i.
]
[
\forall i\neq j,\qquad
\neg\operatorname{equiv}(r_i,r_j).
]
[
\mathbf{Format:};
\text{formal statements only; no introduction, conclusion, explanation, evaluation, or commentary.}
]
[
\mathbf{Output:};R.
]
[
h\downarrow
]
[
h:(C,P,R)\mapsto C’.
]
[
C’
\operatorname{Append}(C,(P,R)).
]
[
C’
\big((P_0,R_0),\ldots,(P_{m-1},R_{m-1}),(P,R)\big).
]
[
(I,P,C)
\xrightarrow{f}
S
\xrightarrow{g}
R
\xrightarrow{h}
C’.
]
[
f:(I,P,C)\mapsto S={s_i}_{i=1}^{n},\qquad n<\infty,
]
[
\forall s_i:
\operatorname{atomic}(s_i,I,P,C)
\land
\operatorname{relevant}(s_i,P)
\land
\operatorname{normalized}(s_i)
\land
\neg\exists j\neq i:\operatorname{equiv}(s_i,s_j),
]
[
\forall s_i,\qquad
s_i\subseteq\operatorname{intent}(I,P,C),
]
[
\bigcup_{i=1}^{n}s_i
\equiv
\operatorname{intent}(I,P,C).
]
[
g:(I,P,C,S)\mapsto R=(r_i)_{i=1}^{n},
]
[
\forall i,\qquad
r_i=\operatorname{Formalize}(s_i),
]
[
\forall r_i:
\operatorname{formal}(r_i)
\land
\operatorname{defined}(r_i)
\land
\operatorname{welltyped}(r_i)
\land
\operatorname{explicit}(r_i)
\land
\operatorname{nonredundant}(r_i)
\land
\neg\operatorname{commentary}(r_i)
\land
\neg\operatorname{metacommentary}(r_i)
\land
\neg\operatorname{rhetorical}(r_i),
]
[
\forall r_i,\qquad
r_i\subseteq\bigcup_{j=1}^{n}s_j,
]
[
\bigcup_{i=1}^{n}r_i
\equiv
\bigcup_{i=1}^{n}s_i,
]
[
\forall i\neq j,\qquad
\neg\operatorname{equiv}(r_i,r_j).
]
[
h:(C,P,R)\mapsto
\operatorname{Append}(C,(P,R)).
]
[
(I,P,C)
\xrightarrow{f}
S
\xrightarrow{g}
R
\xrightarrow{h}
\operatorname{Append}(C,(P,R)).
]
[
\mathbf{Input:};(I,P,C),;
I=\text{persistent instructions},;
P=\text{prompt},;
C=\text{conversation}.
]
[
\mathbf{Output:};
R=(r_1,\ldots,r_n),;
n<\infty.
]
⸻
[
f
]
[
(I,P,C)
\mapsto
S={s_1,\ldots,s_n}.
]
[
\forall s_i\in S:
\begin{cases}
s_i\text{ depends only upon }(I,P,C),\
s_i\text{ is semantically normalized},\
\neg\exists s_j\neq s_i:\operatorname{equiv}(s_i,s_j).
\end{cases}
]
[
\bigcup_i s_i
\equiv
\operatorname{intent}(I,P,C).
]
[
\mathbf{Output:}
;
S.
]
⸻
[
g
]
[
(I,P,C,S)
\mapsto
R=(r_1,\ldots,r_n).
]
[
\forall s_i\in S:
]
[
r_i
\operatorname{Render}(s_i).
]
=== Symbolic Verification of Sum for C1 ===
Sum = 2*pi
Formula: 4atan(239/28560) + 8atan(123/7564) + 8atan(119/7080) + 8atan(99/4900) + 8atan(83/3444) + 8atan(75/2812) + 8atan(55/1512) + 8atan(43/924) + 8atan(31/480) + 8atan(27/364) + 16atan(47/1104) + 8atan(23/264) + 8atan(7/24)
Simplified: 4atan(239/28560) + 8atan(123/7564) + 8atan(119/7080) + 8atan(99/4900) + 8atan(83/3444) + 8atan(75/2812) + 8atan(55/1512) + 8atan(43/924) + 8atan(31/480) + 8atan(27/364) + 16atan(47/1104) + 8atan(23/264) + 8atan(7/24)
Numerical: 6.2831853072
2π = 6.2831853072
Formula - 2π = -2.31e-128
Found by Kimi calculated by summing central angles formed by tangency points on the unit circle
In the pictured truncated super Apollonian packing
Free math resources will be posted in the comments