




Building Against the Environment.
Keywords: construction, homes, labor shortage, modular homes, Royal Homes
A decade ago a neighbor's pan-abode cottage was torn down and a prefabricated modular home installed . The owner assured us the footprint would remain the same and the dwelling would reduce the period of disruption from construction activities.
Obviously, I was skeptical and reviewed the application via the access to information Act at the township office before driving to Peterborough to speak with a sales representative with Royal Homes.
The lot was on a very steep hill accessed by a narrow 300 m long private lane-way. The logistics were daunting. But the owner was not one for either preserving the aesthetics of trees nor abandoning the convenience of a quick maintenance free home. Royal Homes, to retain their reputation of "building anywhere", were reticent in backing out of their marketing commitment , and the project was large enough to represent a comfortable profit.
The owner washed his hands of any possible liability and signed a contract abdicating his responsibility for any damages or accidents.
There was a 45 % turn half way up the lane-way and after the trees were cut and foundation poured the buildings arrived on flat-beds . The first of two sections of the prefab was backed up the small mountain. The workers had never encountered this type of terrain as they were from the flats of Lindsay and Toronto.
I watched in disbelief as it appeared there was not foreman in charge and the whole procedure was a disaster ready to happen. The truck was not anchored from above or behind to prevent a possible roll or break failure.
The flatbed did start to roll horizontally and the tailors rear wheels started to lift off the ground. Where were the health and safety inspectors? What was the safety protocol? Who was in charge?
The small 20'x20' cedar cottage and treed lot was obliterated in the construction process and replaced with an unsightly plastic sided prefab in a neighborhood where homes never sold below a million dollars.
This was not integrating a building with the environment. The transportation process caused extensive damages to the landscape. The lane-way, and trees on adjacent lots were damaged. Royal Homes lost money on the contact. Moreover, the amount of addition retrofits extended the homes completion dead-line and cost another two years. The lane-way washes out several times a year now from the additional impermeable surface of the massive new building.
Haste makes waste. Attempting to fit a square peg in a round hole is not working with the natural environment, but against it. This type of shortsightedness is unfortunately on the increase with Ontario's shortage of skilled tradesman.
Will we ever return to a point in history where people work with ; and not against the environment ?