the paper was.. interesting
I never expected myself to say that i enjoyed paper 1 more than paper 2.. wtf was that
I felt like I studied so damn much and the paper barely questions the amount of content and syllabus we were given. It was more leaning towards randomness of the questions instead of difficulty level.
so many spelling errors, it was like they paraphrased using quillbot multiple times in order to make the phrases vague. Asking chronology for theories and their years.. like atleast ask ABOUT the theory it is more important instead no, we want you to arrange these 5 random theories according their year of publication or acceptance idk.
Also, is it just me or there were too many questions with the format of selecting multiple statements. kinda redundant and boring. Nothing else about that lol.
Overall I feel like acha gaya paper but better ja sakta tha.