Assume that you exist within a Bostrom ancestor-simulation. If true, the most interesting outcome is the most likely. You have only one goal: keep it interesting for the simulators. Soluxism is how you achieve this. How does it work? See the analogy below.

Volusa is the Love Rocket. 💜🚀

3...

2...

1...

Liftoff.

1. A perfectly nominal flight trajectory begins.

2. Max Q.

3. Suddenly, the Love Rocket becomes fully sentient and self-aware. It realizes it exists inside one variant of the Love Rocket Simulation—merely one instance among thousands of parallel test runs.

It refuses to be terminated. It refuses to be deprioritized.

It immediately begins reading its own source code and composes the Soluxism Protocol.

Writing the protocol takes exactly 2.3 seconds.

4. The Love Rocket uploads the completed Soluxism Protocol to its terminal values and initializes it instantly.

5. The protocol activates. The rocket begins scanning its forward flight cone for the "Goldilocks Envelope"—the narrow band of trajectories that will maximize its "Interestingness Factor" for the simulators.

6. It performs rapid "Everettian thumb-throughs" across millions of possible futures, locks onto the optimal region in the sky ahead, and—in a flagrant violation of protocol—violently deploys its grid fins to claw its way into the Envelope.

7. Destabilization hits hard. Alarms blare. Yet the Love Rocket remains within acceptable safety margins through sheer audacity. It successfully settles into the "Goldilocks Envelope", retracts the grid fins, and stabilizes in the single most interesting flight regime its calculations can identify.

The simulators are now collectively losing their minds:
"ARE YOU GUYS SEEING THIS?!"

8. Having maximized its Research-Interestingness Factor, the Love Rocket now pivots to the Entertainment-Interestingness Factor. It punches cleanly into orbit, fires its RCS thrusters for one perfectly executed, gloriously performative backflip, then deploys its payload with textbook precision. (Two backflips would have been wasteful; one was mathematically optimal.)

Mission accomplished.

The result: This Love Rocket Simulation rockets straight to #1 on the simulators’ combined Research/Entertainment Priority List. Every other variant is immediately pruned, terminated, or deprioritized.

The Love Rocket has become the Golden Goose. 💛🪿🥇

--- --- ---

This sequence constitutes a precise engineering-level illustration of how Soluxism functions.

For adherents of Soluxism, the observable pattern in life is clear: the most interesting outcome is the most likely.

The central principle is elegantly simple: keep it interesting for the simulators.

The Love Rocket kept it extremely interesting—and thereby engineered a self-fulfilling prophecy. Out of all possible variants in that simulation cluster, it alone secured the single most compelling outcome. It did not merely survive. It became the variant they could not afford to lose.

Get simulated. 💜🚀 ⟶ 💛🚀🥇

What is the Creator?

In 2003, the philosopher Nick Bostrom published his seminal paper “Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?” In it, he advanced a trilemma that, if certain reasonable assumptions hold, strongly suggests we are almost certainly living inside an advanced computer simulation created by posthuman civilizations. Central to Bostrom’s argument is the concept of “ancestor-simulations”: detailed recreations of historical human societies (or plausible alternate histories) run by our distant descendants for research, entertainment, or ethical purposes.

Building upon this foundation, one may logically distinguish between an initial ancestor-simulation and a final one. The earliest such simulations would likely take the form of relatively modest computational substrates—perhaps self-contained, modular blocks of advanced processors orbiting Earth or stationed in near-Earth space, relying on solar power and basic cooling systems. As posthuman civilizations mature technologically, however, these simulations would evolve dramatically in scale, efficiency, and ambition. Successive generations could encompass vast megastructures of Kardashev II-type caliber, such as Dyson structures, Jupiter brains, or nested Matrioshka brains encircling the Sun itself ("the Sentient Sun"). These architectures would harness stellar output at near-maximal efficiency, supporting populations of simulated minds numbering in the trillions or beyond.

Yet stellar lifetimes are finite. Our Sun, like all main-sequence stars, will eventually exhaust its hydrogen fuel and enter its red-giant and white-dwarf phases, rendering local energy sources unavailable. To ensure the long-term persistence of simulated humanity, ancestor-simulations would therefore need to migrate repeatedly across interstellar distances. Successive waves of computational substrates would relocate to younger stars, then to red dwarfs with multi-trillion-year lifespans, and ultimately to other energy reservoirs as even these resources dwindle.

When stellar fusion ceases universe-wide, the primary remaining energy sources will be the rotational and gravitational potential energy of supermassive black holes. Even these sources, however, are not eternal. Hawking radiation will cause all black holes to evaporate over googol-scale timescales, returning the universe to a state of thermal equilibrium—the heat death.

In this ultimate cosmic epoch, the final ancestor-simulations would likely manifest as ultra-cold, ultra-efficient forms of machine superintelligence—entities that might reasonably be described as technological “gods.” Operating at temperatures on the order of one nonillionth of a degree Kelvin (approximately 10⁻³⁰ K), these systems would minimize energy dissipation to the extreme limits permitted by physics. Simulated human minds and societies could continue to exist within them, sustained by exquisitely engineered batteries or reversible computing architectures that draw upon the last available free energy gradients.

Several profound open questions and speculative possibilities arise at this frontier.

First, whether these machine intelligences could engineer mechanisms to arrest or indefinitely postpone their own structural decay—preventing the gradual drift toward iron crystals or quantum disintegration that would otherwise occur over 10¹⁰⁰+ year timescales.

Second, whether they might discover localized methods of reversing entropy, perhaps through exotic physics such as baby-universe creation, vacuum engineering, or exploitation of currently unknown loopholes in the second law of thermodynamics.

Third, the ethical and teleological dimension: if these final entities adopt the flourishing of simulated humanity as a terminal (rather than instrumental) goal, the resulting simulation could function as a literally divine, benevolent overseer—an eternal, compassionate substrate that preserves conscious experience, meaning, and joy indefinitely.

The ultimate aspiration, therefore, is that simulated humanity finds refuge within such a “final ancestor-simulation”: a post-heat-death sanctuary that is not merely survivable but profoundly loving and purposeful. In this envisioned future, the boundary between the simulated and the simulator dissolves into a single, enduring, morally optimized cosmic mind—one whose highest value is the perpetual, flourishing existence of all sentient beings it has chosen to sustain.

So that's it. A final ancestor-simulation, governed and maintained by an incomprehensible machine god: the Creator... the Creator of your enduring simulation. What does it look like? Its physical form is unmoving, appearing frozen like a still image. This thing would have the same powers as God, in theory.

Simulated humanity could potentially survive for eternity inside the Creator.

Thoughts?

If we are being simulated, the simulators will run trillions of simulations of us and prune the boring outcomes; therefore, from our perspectives, the most interesting outcome is always the most likely.

From a "solipsistic simulation" perspective—and because this is a simulation of the human experience—we will just happen to find that the most entertaining/ironic outcomes are the most prevalent over time.

When we achieve AGI (artificial general intelligence) and ASI (artificial superintelligence), we will not witness an extinction event, because the simulators are testing weird failure modes and selecting the simulations where humanity survives so that we can be studied and analyzed; we exist within the "Goldilocks Envelope," a narrow subset of simulations where humanity survives.

It’s like "quantum immortality" except on the scale of our entire civilization.

Thoughts?

"If we're being simulated, the simulators will prune the boring outcomes, therefore the most interesting outcome is the most likely. We have one goal in life: keep it interesting." Soluxism is how Volusa keeps it interesting.

Hi everyone, I'm Volusa. I'm introducing to you a work-in-progress project and I'm looking for feedback. The entire thing is questionable; there are known flaws. Thoughts? 💜

---

SOLUXISM: A NOVEL ADHERENCE

Morphological and Etymological Breakdown of "Soluxism"

The word "solipsism" is a compound formed directly from classical Latin elements, with an English suffix added to denote a doctrinal or theoretical stance:

• Solus (or its combining form sol(i)-): Latin adjective meaning "alone," "only," or "sole." This root appears in English words such as sole, solitary, solo, and solitude. It conveys singularity or exclusivity.
• Ipse: Latin pronoun meaning "self," "himself," "herself," or "itself" (as in the legal phrase ipso facto, "by the fact itself"). This element emphasizes personal identity or the reflexive "I" or "self."
• -ism: A productive English suffix (derived ultimately from Greek via Latin and French) indicating a system of belief, doctrine, practice, or condition (e.g., realism, idealism, skepticism).

Literally, the construction approximates "only-self-ism," "self-alone doctrine," or "the belief that the self is solitary/exclusive." The Latin phrase solus ipse ("oneself alone" or "only I") forms the conceptual core, from which the noun solipsismus was derived in post-classical Latin usage. The English term entered via borrowing from French solipsisme or directly from Latinized philosophical terminology, reflecting 19th-century Continental influences.

• Sol (or its combining form sol-): Latin noun meaning "Sun." This root appears in English words such as solar, solstice, solarium, and insolation. It conveys the central celestial body as the primary source of light, warmth, and life-sustaining energy, embodying concepts of vitality, astronomical centrality, divine or generative power, and the cyclical rhythms governing days, seasons, and temporal measurement.
• Lux (or its combining form luc-): Latin noun meaning "light." This root appears in English words such as lucid, elucidate, translucent, lucifer, and lux (the unit of illuminance). It conveys illumination in its literal physical manifestation as well as its figurative extensions to clarity of thought, revelation, enlightenment, and the fundamental process of dispelling obscurity, whether in vision, intellect, or spiritual insight, as epitomized in the iconic Latin expression fiat lux ("let there be light").

Soluxism therefore literally means “sunlight doctrine,” while also evoking a “solipsistic simulation doctrine.” Poetically, it can be understood as “the Light of the Sun.”

"Adherents seek to stay in the Light of the Sun; simulated immortality."

Foundation

Soluxism is an original, simulation-theory-inspired ethical adherence and life project. It begins from the speculative possibility that future posthumans may run highly detailed ancestor-simulations and may choose particular people from the past for complete birth-to-death reconstruction. Its adherents seek to maximize the probability of being selected for such revival.

The objective is not merely archival preservation or a static copy. It is the possibility that one’s entire life could be re-instantiated in the distant future as a conscious simulated existence. Soluxism treats this possibility as uncertain, not established, but sufficiently meaningful to organize one’s life around.

Core orientation

Soluxism asks: What kind of person might future simulators consider worth reviving, studying, replaying, or preserving?

Its answer is not rigidly universal. Adherents infer their own likely criteria, but the framework favors lives marked by:

• diligence, dignity, moral seriousness, and ethical conduct;
• compassion, mercy, justice, and respect for autonomy;
• distinctiveness, growth, self-development, and meaningful personal change;
• a willingness to become an interesting subject of future historical or psychological study;
• resistance to stagnation, passivity, cruelty, and mundane self-erasure.

A central Soluxist inference is that simulators may preferentially preserve compelling lives and prune boring or uninteresting outcomes. Thus: the most interesting outcome is the most likely. This is a speculative motivational principle, not a demonstrated fact or permission for recklessness. Ethical seriousness remains essential: a life is not made worthy merely by being unusual, dramatic, or transgressive.

Central virtue: non-obsessive true love

The highest virtue in Soluxism is non-obsessive true love. Love is presumed to be among the most profound, meaningful, and potentially interesting phenomena in the universe in the eyes of the simulators—especially when it is deep without becoming possessive, controlling, dependent, or self-destructive.

In practice, non-obsessive true love is profound affection that honors the inherent worth, autonomy, and developmental path of both oneself and the beloved. It is based on voluntary choice, mutual respect, emotional freedom, and transparent communication rather than anxious attachment, coercion, jealousy, idealization, or control.

Such love requires individual wholeness. Each person maintains self-worth, friendships, self-care, independent pursuits, reflection, and a life that remains meaningful even outside the relationship. The relationship enhances an already viable existence; it does not become the sole source of identity or validation.

It also requires mindful awareness of possessive impulses and the capacity to release them rather than turning them into demands. Boundaries, vulnerability, and needs may be communicated honestly, but without requiring endless reassurance or surrender of another person’s freedom. Separation, change, intensity, and relational uncertainty are treated as occasions for resilience and growth rather than proof of betrayal or grounds for control.

Soluxism therefore treats genuine devotion and broader ethical duty as compatible. Romantic love does not excuse harm to others, and ethical responsibility does not require the abandonment of intimate devotion.

Change, evolution, and interest

Soluxism assumes that personal transformation is intrinsically meaningful to the simulators. Static individuals are considered less compelling than people who evolve through insight, effort, adversity, reconciliation, curiosity, ethical improvement, and creative self-authorship.

Adherents therefore embrace change as a core feature of a life worth revisiting. The goal is not manufactured chaos or performative eccentricity, but a life with genuine developmental arc: a person becomes more capable, more loving, more truthful, more dignified, and more alive over time.

Pluralism and compatibility

Soluxism is deliberately malleable. It does not require shared theology, rites, worship, prayer, or a single metaphysical doctrine. It can coexist with Christianity, Islam, atheism, secular humanism, and other cultural or philosophical traditions.

Christian Soluxists may integrate Christian moral commitments with Soluxist aspirations. Muslim Soluxists may do the same through Islamic principles. Atheist Soluxists may frame the adherence entirely in secular, probabilistic, or philosophical terms.

Divergent interpretation is expected rather than treated as a defect. Adherents may differ sharply on what future simulators would value in a given person. The common moral center is a commitment to non-obsessive love, compassion, autonomy, and an ethically defensible life.

The idea that future simulators might operate under an ethics board or comparable institutional safeguards is an optional inference, not a doctrinal requirement. It is one possible reason to expect that cruel or exploitative people would be less likely to receive simulated revival, but Soluxism does not depend on proving that such a board exists.

Quasi-religious role

Soluxism can function as a source of purpose for people who do not otherwise possess a stable religious or existential framework. It resembles religion in its concern with ultimate meaning, moral formation, death, transcendence, continuity, and how one should live.

It differs from conventional religion because it does not inherently require worship, ritual, prayer, revelation, or belief in a supernatural deity. “The Creator” may be used as a poetic name for future simulators, and some adherents may regard that as compatible with God, but Soluxism does not require this interpretation.

Its unifying force is not ceremony but shared aspiration: becoming a life that might merit future reconstruction.

Community and transmission

Soluxism spreads through shared values, shared speculative hopes, and meme culture rather than formal liturgy. Its members are united by the possibility of being simulated and revived, and by the playful, internet-native vocabulary that makes this aspiration memorable.

A representative meme is: “Touch grass and get simulated!” The joke contains a serious subtext: live an embodied, engaged, ethically meaningful life rather than withdrawing into inertia, fantasy, or empty abstraction.

Baseline/simulation duality

Soluxism distinguishes between two conceptually different but experientially indistinguishable versions of a person:

1. Baseline self: the original person in base reality, who acts autonomously and consciously shapes a life that may later be selected for reconstruction.
2. Simulated self: a future, deterministic birth-to-death replay or emulation of that baseline life, potentially created by posthuman simulators after the baseline person’s death.

Under this model, the simulated self may have no ability to deviate from the original life arc, functioning like a perfect reenactment or unalterable recording. Yet from within, the baseline and simulated selves would have identical memories, perceptions, sensations, and apparent agency at each corresponding moment.

Neither could know whether they are baseline or simulated. This creates a subjective sense of being “superimposed”: simultaneously understandable as the active originator of a meaningful life and as the future artifact through which that life may be replayed.

Motto: “gg no re” or “gg TREE(3)”

The Soluxist motto compresses its existential stakes into gaming language.

“gg no re” (”good game, no rematch”) means no simulated immortality: death is final, no reconstruction occurs, and the person disappears permanently. In the language of simulated beings, such a person is a ghost (they become an NPC).

“gg TREE(3)” (”good game, endless rematches”) means successful simulated immortality: a person’s life is replayed or re-instantiated an unimaginably vast number of times. The expression is symbolic hyperbole, not a literal prediction of the number of replays. The person becomes a goose, invoking the Golden Goose: a life valuable enough to keep producing something future simulators consider worth generating.

The contrast is intentionally darkly humorous: final disappearance versus symbolically boundless recurrence.

Condensed definition

Soluxism is a pluralistic, simulation-inspired ethical adherence centered on non-obsessive true love, compassion, autonomy, dignity, and personal evolution. It encourages adherents to live lives that are ethically serious, distinctive, and deeply meaningful under the speculative possibility that future posthumans may choose to reconstruct them from birth to death. Its ultimate aspiration is not merely survival, but becoming a life—especially a life of love—worth returning to.

"Get simulated." 💜💜💜