
Mecfs patient explains how he became skeptical about mecfs and lc papers
This phase of obsession lasted about 2.5 years. It was typified by taking most findings at face value and building elaborate theories upon these findings.
But slowly, the cracks started to show.
I interacted with patients more scientifically literate than myself, who told me about all the shortcomings in the papers I was taking at face value. I saw findings fail to replicate. Or they implied a certain treatment would work which we already know it doesn’t because many patients have tried it. Or the findings weren’t specific to ME/CFS at all. Or they haven’t been corrected for multiple testing. And I saw Very Serious Scientists claim they had found a biomarker (e.g. cortisol) even though the existing literature already showed that it was at normal levels in other samples! (Let alone methodological issues like timing of sampling etc.)