
Guys this is serious
The YouTuber Iron Cameraman made a post that i copy pasted here for y'all
"HELP BRING THIS SITUATION TO A WIDER AUDIENCE🔥
One viewer wrote a comment to lawyer Law By Mike, suggesting that he cover the situation with Inviz. He replied to the comment asking whether more people also want him to break down this topic.
Of course - Mike would only cover this if he could talk about legitimate legal concerns. We should tell Mike that there are questionable things happening here from a legal standpoint.
Here are some examples of what is worth mentioning:
• The company's CEO appears to be using NDA and contract restrictions to prevent DafuqBoom from speaking publicly about the situation. His interview with journalist Steven Asarch was never released because Boom is required to get every statement about the company or Skibidi Toilet approved first. This raises concerns that the NDA is being used not only to protect confidential information, but also as a tool of pressure and control over the public position of the original creator.
• Inviz publicly revealed private messages with Alexey Gerasimov without his consent. The company used these private messages to defend its position in the conflict, even though the conversation was not meant to be made public. This raises serious concerns about privacy violations, pressure on the creator, and the use of private communication as a PR weapon against him.
• Inviz is sending mass strikes to content creators who criticize the company. These creators say they are using content under fair use laws. There appears to be no other reason for these strikes other than retaliation for speaking against the company. Additionally, the company allegedly sends these strikes through a third party that has a reputation for sending aggressive strikes and scamming creators.
• Inviz allegedly threatened to leak a recording of a private call without the consent of the participants.
• Inviz is using strikes to pressure content creators into signing contracts with the company. A third party representing the company's interests directly threatened a YouTuber with strikes if they refused to agree to the contract.
• These contracts appear to be extremely unfair and one-sided.
• Many of these creators are minors and do not have the opportunity to show the contracts to lawyers before signing them.
These are just a few examples, and many of these points can be explained in much more detail. There is also a lot more that I did not include here because I tried to keep this as short as possible. It is better if you explain the situation in your own words. The main goal right now is to show activity and make it clear that many people care about this issue.
The link to the video where you should leave comments is here:
https://youtu.be/wgq3ca7ewd8?si=vnCKB...
Also, besides leaving a comment, it would be ideal to make a couple of posts on Twitter/X mentioning him. If you can do that, it would be absolutely perfect. On Twitter/X, he is tagged as @lawbymike_
If we organize this properly, there is a big chance he will make a video, and the Skibidi situation could get on the radar of other big YouTubers!
P.s. Mike, if you're reading this, I'd be happy to help with any information, context, evidence, or contacts that could be useful. You can reach me at: theagentlab7@gmail.com
You can also reach out to the creator at the center of this drama, Dafuqboom himself, by emailing him here: