Reading the Puritans?
Since I have been hearing about the Puritans for years from such prominent Christians as John Piper, John, MacArthur, Kevin DeYoung, etc., I recently took advantage of a Truth for Life offer and acquired three Puritan Treasures for Today titles. Then I stumbled across a Room for Nuance podcast featuring Stephen Yuille, in which he recommended two PTT titles specifically:
William Perkins's "Perfect Redeemer"
George Swinnock's "Blesses and Boundless God."
I've started reading "Perfect Redeemer," and I'm thinking he's committing eisegesis? He's expounding on Phil 3:7-11 and is arguing that Paul is counting as loss things that, in my opinion, don't line up with a natural reading of the text--his Apostleship, the fruit of the Spirit in his life, etc. this led me to understand that, even though the Puritans were spiritual Giants, they were also just men who are also capable of reading their own biases into the text.
This being the case, are they still really worth the time and money I could potentially invest in them, or does this experience serve to confirm that, in some ways, they will be no better than reading, say, John Piper or Sinclair Ferguson?