If you get a hospitalist malpractice lawsuit going to trial, is your jury of “peers” seriously like what we had for Lindsay Clancy?
Wtf. For Clancy trial, we had jurors who were or are in healthcare (nurses) or presumably were educated (schoolteacher) who already made up their mind way before the trial started, about how the psychiatrists and doctors in the trial talked about “medical BS” and already felt Clancy was not guilty and deserved compassion. The nurse jurors even talked about how they tried to “explain” the psych meds to other jurors???
Every nurse I interacted with in the hospital didn’t know jack shit about medications!!!
The jurors believed Clancy had postpartum psychosis when never in the literature is there a case of postpartum psychosis at 8months after delivery!! 99.999999% of cases occur in the first FEW WEEKS!
Is this what hospitalists have to face in a lawsuit?? Jurors of “your peer” who “feel compassion” for the plaintiff patients and that “doctors with their medical BS” must automatically lose???
Am i taking crazy pills??