

Gender of these two lil birbs
The seller told me the green one is female and blue one is male but still i wanna confirm!


The seller told me the green one is female and blue one is male but still i wanna confirm!
I found this baby pigeon in ny home, it had fallen down from the roof, no visible injury.
It can flap its wings but cannot properly fly, it was scared from me at first by slowly he got used to me.
I dont know what to give it to eat, should i hand feed or will it eat by himself?
abd how often he has to eat...
EDIT: HE IS REUNITED WITH HIS FAMILY NOW!!!
Looking for a person who can add phone numbers to a whatsapp group...
Requirements: Phone, whatsapp, internet
Pay: 0.25rs per number
100 numbers per day
I have 1000+ numbers
ONLY FOR INDIANS
COMMENT INTRESTED
Its been 1.5 months since i got em and its been hella difficult to tame them. They are too scared when i approach the cage. I cannot find millet spray locally.
I want to make them get out of the cage but im too scared that i will lose a bit trust that i have gained so far.
Please help me im too stresses!!!
Hot take: a huge amount of “high-skill” work people spent years protecting was never actually that hard once the tools became accessible.
The reason people are panicking about AI isn’t because AI is magically smarter than humans. It’s because it removes the advantage of being the only person who knew how to do something.
Need a logo? AI.
Need coding help? AI.
Need marketing ideas? AI.
Need music inspiration? AI.
And suddenly people who built entire identities around “you could never do this without us” are getting challenged by random teenagers with laptops.
The funniest part is that truly talented people aren’t scared. The best artists, programmers, filmmakers, and writers are using AI as a multiplier already. The people screaming the loudest are usually the ones whose value depended on information being hard to access.
AI won’t kill creativity. It’ll kill artificial scarcity.
In 5 years, knowing how to think will matter way more than memorizing workflows.
We’ve officially entered the era where AI doesn’t just respond — it reasons, plans, and even acts on your behalf.
From coding full apps in minutes to generating hyper-real videos that look indistinguishable from reality, the line between human and machine creativity is getting blurry fast.
💡 What’s new right now:
AI agents that can complete multi-step tasks (not just answer prompts)
Real-time voice conversations that feel human
Video generation that rivals actual filmmaking
Personalized AI assistants that adapt to YOU over time
But here’s the real question:
👉 Are we building tools… or replacements?
Some people think AI will just make life easier.
Others think it’s quietly reshaping jobs, creativity, and even identity itself.
📊 Imagine this: In a few years, your favorite content creator, coder, or even “influencer”… might not be human at all.
So where do YOU stand?
🔥 Is AI the ultimate upgrade for humanity
or
⚠️ the beginning of something we won’t be able to control?
Drop your take below — no safe answers.
So I just saw this CNN piece and had to share because I feel like it's not getting enough attention.
The DoD just signed AI deals with 8 companies — OpenAI, Google, Microsoft, SpaceX, Nvidia, AWS, Oracle, and some company called Reflection. Anthropic is not on the list.
The reason? Anthropic refused to let the Pentagon use Claude for "all lawful purposes" which apparently includes autonomous weapons and mass surveillance. So the Trump admin labeled them a "supply chain risk" — a designation that's normally reserved for companies linked to foreign adversaries. Wild framing.
The kicker is that Claude was literally the only AI model in the Pentagon's classified network until recently. Now they've been cut out entirely and their competitors are splitting that revenue.
I genuinely don't know how to feel about this. On one hand Anthropic is leaving serious money on the table by holding the line on safety guardrails. On the other hand... should any AI company be signing away control of how their model gets used in warfare with zero conditions?
Like does "we won't let governments use our AI to target people autonomously" count as a reasonable business term or is Anthropic being naive about how this stuff actually works in practice?
Curious what this sub thinks. Is this principled or just bad business?
A landmark ruling just dropped in China: a court ruled that companies cannot legally fire employees purely to replace them with AI for cost-cutting. The case involved a tech worker who was dismissed after an LLM took over his role.
This is huge. We've been debating "will AI take jobs?" for years — but now we're entering the phase where governments are actually stepping in with legal answers.
A few things worth discussing:
Is this the right call, or does it slow down productivity gains that benefit everyone.
Will we see similar laws in the US or EU?
Does this actually protect workers, or just delay the inevitable?
Meanwhile, the NSA is reportedly testing Anthropic's new AI model to find cybersecurity vulnerabilities in Microsoft software. AI is simultaneously being restricted in the workplace and handed to intelligence agencies. Make that make sense.
What do you think — should there be legal limits on AI replacing human workers?
Hey everyone! I'm u/aintvoidnull, a founding moderator of r/ClassicAI. This is our new home for all things related to [ADD WHAT YOUR SUBREDDIT IS ABOUT HERE]. We're excited to have you join us!
What to Post Post anything that you think the community would find interesting, helpful, or inspiring. Feel free to share your thoughts, photos, or questions about AI.
Community Vibe We're all about being friendly, constructive, and inclusive. Let's build a space where everyone feels comfortable sharing and connecting.
How to Get Started
Thanks for being part of the very first wave. Together, let's make r/ClassicAI amazing.