u/alexdenne

There is now a slice of r/legaltech where promotion is welcome(!)

In all other posts on all other days, Rule 1 applies in full. In this new weekly post series, go for it.

Request to everyone to ensure this is valuable

Please ask questions about pricing, data handling, what happens to your documents, actual customer counts. That's the point of doing this in the open.

Ground rules for vendors

1. Vendor flair is required to pitch. Replies and questions don't need flair; that requirement is for pitches only. Instructions on how to do this are below. Vendor comments without flair will be removed.
2. One comment per company with one link per pitch.
3. No link shorteners, no redirect domains, and no "DM me for details", everything stays as discussion where the community can see it and learn from it.
4. Feel free to link people to your rlegaltech.com listing if you have one (and tag me if you want to claim the 'Verified Vendor' flair for next week).
5. No upvote brigading. I check. Vendors caught vote-manipulating end up on the public r/legaltech shill wall.
6. Posting a pitch = opting in to the r/legaltech rules and the vendor conduct standards at rlegaltech.com/rules.
7. Use the template below (or I'll assume you haven't read the other rules)

Pitch template (copy/paste)

• What it is:
• Who it's for:
• Link:

How to set your Vendor flair (30 seconds)

• Mobile app: open r/legaltech → tap the three dots (⋯) top right → Change user flair → select "Vendor: Company name", tap Edit to type your company → Apply.
• Desktop: go to the r/legaltech home page → in the right-hand sidebar, find your username and click the pencil/edit icon next to "User Flair" → select "Vendor: Company name" → click the pencil on it to edit the text, replace "Company name" with your company → Apply.

A few weeks back (link) we had Winston and Gabe from Harvey do an AMA again here. There were a lot of good questions (and they were tougher than they were for the first AMA — link).

Some highly voted questions went unanswered to a depth you all felt they deserved/wanted.

So I've had a go at interviewing Gabe from Harvey, and publishing that to Youtube.

• 02:19 Keeping client data private (credit to u/Guzzled)
• 10:10 A bit on pricing (credit to airspacemess)
• 20:01 Will Claude for Legal replace Harvey? (credit to u/Expensive_Net_4738)

(other chapter links not mentioned above)

• 00:15 The Reddit ARR bombshell
• 01:17 Acquisitions: buying a "neo lab"
• 08:15 Early access to GPT-5.6 + Fable 5
• 08:30 Faking an S-1 his GC can't spot: synthetic data rooms
• 09:36 Customers on Grok, & Gemini's moment in the sun
• 11:59 Benchmarks and product roadmap + synthetic data generation
• 16:08 Simulated legal worlds & prepping Neal Katyal for the Supreme Court
• 17:57 Who to sell to in law firms

Disclaimer: Harvey didn't pay for this (nobody pays me for this stuff), and I'm not here to sell them. If this video or channel ever monetises, I'll just put the money into hosting rlegaltech.com and trying to improve the community wiki (e.g. with some back-end eng support)

This is the first video I've done, so editing is rough in places, and I made a few mistakes throughout, but I hope the conversation is interesting enough to forgive those bits.

Link to the full video: https://youtu.be/-8fEyx75lfU

If people like the format I'll offer it out to previous AMA guests, and for future ones. I'm also open to others helping to post to this community youtube channel.

Feedback very much welcome.

Seriously though — Automod rules were loosened as genuine contributors were getting caught, and more 'request for feedback' posts have been getting through as a result.

I'll see if I can improve those rules today, without having consistent (and human) contributors caught out by it too.

Please keep reporting accounts/posts if you suspect them of AI sloppage, it's very helpful.

Also — Not legaltech related, but I found this video worth a watch to see how this problem is progressing in general.

Channel = Cold Fusion
Video = YouTube is Already 20% AI Slop