u/avishic

What's your company / second brain setup?

I was talking to a few folks, and these solutions came up -

• A shared folder of Markdown, interlinked, over Google Drive or One drive, often with Obsidian as md editor - Claude access it locally.
• A github-hosted wiki, sometimes with additional indexing, not only plain md files - Claude access via github
• Custom complex vector db / embedding kind of index - Claude accesses it with MCP

As we explore solutions, I wonder what others are doing, please share.

What's your second brain setup?

I was talking to a few folks, and these came up -

• A shared folder of Markdown, interlinked, over Google Drive or One drive, often with Obsidian as md editor.
• A github-hosted wiki, sometimes with additional indexing, not only plain md files
• Custom complex vector db / embedding kind of index

On my team we're using a shared hermes agent that has ts own memory and tools - it's a great way to have shared context, but it's more like one-know-all-agent rather than a company / second brain as my gpt / claude can't enjoy its knowledge.

I wonder what others are doing, please share.

I am using Hermes agents, along with my local Claude and GPT.

First, Hermes memory works really well as-is - markdown notes, builds its own skills, and a local db. GPT and Claude also improved a lot, and my only problem there is that they lock me in, i don't own the memory structure.

I see many open-source and saas solutions for memory, so my questions are:

• Do we really need external memory? Agents already have a built-in one, and it's pretty good.
• To those using external memory - can you share before/after?
• How does it work?

What’s the easiest way to go from an HTML made with Claude to a public website?

There’s a built-in way to publish artifacts, but it’s hard to control and no custom domain.

Claude code can take it but is that a smooth flow? Assume no engineers in process and it’s a simple site, interactive, rich, but no login/database.

What’s the right way to go from Claude Design to a public website?

There’s a built-in way to publish artifacts, but it’s hard to control and no custom domain.

Claude code can take it but is that a smooth flow? Assume no engineers in process and it’s a portfolio site, interactive, rich, but no login/database.

OpenClaw vs Vibe coding -

For personal tools, I no longer vibe code, i ask my agent, usually with a 5min voice message to build, test and deploy it for me. My mom recently asked me for an app - i asked her for a voice message to forward to my agent.

For websites, we recently released a new tool with a fresh site, and it was mixed - design happened in Figma + claude design, implementation in Claude Code - and maintenance now happens over Slack with our marketing agent (change copy, meta, cta, navigation items, publishing blog posts).

Some of our agents don’t code directly, the operate a local Codex / Claude Code.

Do you still vibe code, or does openclaw removed that need?

For me and my team, HTML is a new type of doc we collaborate on now - reports, slides, designs, mini apps, etc.

While Claude can share it as an artifact, it’s not so friendly for other agents and Google drive is also very hard with HTML.

How do you share HTML?

I have multiple agents, and mostly i want them to have their own scope, but

1. Some agents are pairs that should have almost identical memory
2. Some need to have similar knowledge on specific topics

Any best practices here?

We currently use six remote AI agents, one local.

We prefer running them on cloud machines because they’re easy to back up and maintain, they always have power and internet, and everyone on the team can access them.

So why a local Mac for one agent - The one thing we’re still missing is a shared Chrome. We want to be able to jump into the Mac’s Chrome, login to a service with bad apis, and have the agent go from there.

Am i missing anything? What’s your setup?

We're a team of 12 humans, 7 agents.

I'm using Slack for our agents' comms, and it's very comfortable.

Attachments are very annoying - 100 versions ping-pong, hard to track.

Google Docs is too hard to set up, and we also don't want too many google accounts for the agents, it's an overkill.

S3 is just too technical for most team members.

What's the best practice?

We're a team of 12 humans, 7 agents (all Hermes btw).

I'm using Slack for our agents' comms, and it's very comfortable.

Attachments are very annoying - 100 versions ping pong, hard to track.

Google Docs is too hard to set up, and we also don't want too many google accounts for the agents, it's an overkill.

S3 is just too technical for most team.

What's the best practice?

Since Opus 4.7, it doesn’t feel like Opus.
Sonnet 5, doesn’t feel like sonnet.
The news around ”it’s so good it is too dangerous” feels like the best growth / marketing campaign in the history.

Wdyt?

I caught it in two seperate cases -

1. Fable 5 completely ignored OpenClaw, mentioning only claude cowork while i was having a deep research and i was touching agents as workforce space.
2. On another case, i was debating my talk about digital employees, Opus trash talked on Hermes, bringing up, again, Claude cowork.

Now I wonder what else it has been pushing, it’s the best lobby in the world.

Do you see similar patterns?

Figma has been postponing its AI agent for 2 years now. 2024 Config title was “Skynet not yet”, and they rolled out a design agent that was quickly rolled back after “copying apple’s weather app” (like 99% designs online).

In 2026, you see that teams start to design with code, directly in Claude/GPT, but also with Lovable/Bolt/Anima - vibe coding has many projects that are actually vibe design. To the point where Anthropic & Google has dedicated tools for it (Claude design, Google Stitch).

Figma laid the ground for design automation in Figma with opening the doors to agents via mcp that could create designs in Figma.

Then came design agents to Figma by 3rd parties, not bounded to Figma’s own limitations or its very expensive AI credits - Buddy the Figma design agent & UX Pilot.

Now comes the official Figma agent.

So my question for you is - how do you see the design space evolving? Will we see less designers? Will designers transition?