
Homeplus, responding to suspicions of selling at a low price, “proceed with court approval”
TL;DR:
- The situation is not good for Homeplus, which is undergoing corporate rehabilitation procedures. Two days before the deadline for approval of the rehabilitation plan (July 3), which will…
- Homeplus emphasized in a statement on the 1st, “All structural innovation activities that have been carried out since the start of rehabilitation procedures were approved by the Seoul…
- The reason the company came forward with such an explanation is because of the claims made by the Emergency Response Committee (hereinafter referred to as the Emergency Committee) for…
[Economist Reporter Ji-wan Lee] The situation is not good for Homeplus, which is undergoing corporate rehabilitation procedures. Two days before the deadline for approval of the rehabilitation plan (July 3), which will determine the company's fate, the conflict between stakeholders appears to have reached its peak.
Homeplus emphasized in a statement on the 1st, “All structural innovation activities that have been carried out since the start of rehabilitation procedures were approved by the Seoul Rehabilitation Court and were carried out through legal procedures.”
The reason the company came forward with such an explanation is because of the claims made by the Emergency Response Committee (hereinafter referred to as the Emergency Committee) for Homeplus product purchase loan victims. On this morning, the Emergency Committee held a press conference to submit a request for investigation into allegations of breach of trust at the Homeplus Yeongdeungpo branch in front of the Seoul Central District Prosecutors' Office in Seocho-gu, Seoul, and claimed, "Circumstances have been revealed in which the core rights of Homeplus, which were an obstacle to the sale and development financing of the Yeongdeungpo branch real estate worth 350 billion won, were sold at a low price of 10 billion won."
According to the Emergency Committee, through the lease agreement, Homeplus had the following rights: ▲long-term lease and 10-year extension right for the Yeongdeungpo branch, ▲right to request purchase (call option), ▲right to restrict sales to a third party, and ▲right to re-enter the store. However, the non-representative committee claims that these rights were deleted or weakened when Homeplus signed an additional lease agreement in May. In addition, the emergency committee also argued that the price for deleting existing Homeplus rights was specified at 10 billion won.
The company is completely denying the allegations raised by the emergency committee. Homeplus emphasized, “The negotiations regarding the lease contract for the Yeongdeungpo branch were made in consideration of all circumstances during the rehabilitation process,” and added, “We must stop pouring cold water on the efforts of Homeplus executives and employees who are doing their best for revival even in difficult situations by raising indiscriminate suspicions.”
He added, "The Yeongdeungpo branch is a loss-making store leased and operated by our company. Store development is carried out by the owner, not the lessee. The store owner sold the real estate for 350 billion won, distorting it into development value."
Meanwhile, the fate of Homeplus, which has been undergoing rehabilitation procedures since March of last year, will soon be decided. On the 30th of last month, the company submitted a revised rehabilitation plan to the Seoul Bankruptcy Court. This is because the Seoul Rehabilitation Court judged that the existing restructuring plan was not feasible. Homeplus requested 200 billion won in emergency operating capital (DIP) loans from Meritz Financial Group, a major creditor, to implement the rehabilitation plan, but it was virtually unsuccessful.
Source: https://economist.co.kr/article/view/ecn202607010054