She probably got threatened by the parties involved and also saw the post here from earlier. The damage has already been done. I saved the video because I was originally going to post it here but decided not to for the sake of the privacy of the parties involved.
I hope she gets sued.
She posted a storytime yesterday on her pages about a teacher and some old classmates. She said she used their real names but omitted last names, but confirmed the full name of one of the students in the comments when someone commented it. She also included the school name and because it's a small town/area it narrowed things down a lot. She says that she doesn't know if anything actually happened and claims she never saw anything technically.
Her video describing the teacher also had mocking and homophobic undertones about the teacher being a lesbian. Generally speaking, if someone is a p3do it would be because they're a p3do, not because they're a lesbian. The fact that they're a lesbian has nothing to do with anything. Kaylie did admit that she never saw anything and that these were rumors but then said she was going to "out" these people on her snapchat stories.
Kaylie also posted a screenshot of the teacher's facebook page where it shows her employment and her exact date she started working. Also, she confirmed in the comments when someone asked if the teacher's last name started with a certain letter and she said yes. These types of confirmation comments are spread across both her Instagram video and TikTok videos. She turned the comments off on her Facebook post because of arguing.
Omitting last names in the video doesn't cover your ass when you post personal details in the video and confirm identifying information in the comments.
If Kaylie was really bothered and truely cared for alledged victims then she would've used fake names and contacted those classmates. But here she is in snapchat bragging about "outing" her classmates. Imo Kaylie's using highschool gossip for engagement after she spiraled yesterday (and lately in general) about being broke and her not making as much on social media. None of this is coming from a place of concern but for clicks.
She's complaining about going broke and rather than taking some accountability. She claims to have saved money and made an emergency fund in the past but this is proving that that's not the case. If her "husband" has money idk why she's spiraling online. It doesn't make her look relatable it makes her look desperate, especially to feed her shopping addiction.
She also just posted a large shopping haul right before all this and constantly posts bamboo hauls and random grocery delivery orders for junk food.
I think she's eventually going to beg her followers for money again at some point, which is probably why she's sharing all this. It honestly doesn't make me have empathy for her when she's been spending money constantly and being a troll. New tattoos, constant shopping hauls, new Pcs, and etc. She upgraded their lifestyles as the money came in knowing that it wasn't going to last forever.
Honestly I saw this happening. I think she's going back to rage baiting on Facebook and her other socials to try and drum up engagement.
She's lurking here and trying to make herself sound better and defend herself. She showed us who she really is in that Snapchat story initially talking about abortion.
In this video she states, "This is a lower percentage but not everyone uses birth control and uses abortion every couple of months every time they get pregnant. There are some people who do it." She also states that she thinks that people shouldn't really get abortions after 24 weeks but especially after 12.
Less than 1% of abortions are performed after 21 weeks and it's often due to genetic abnormalities and 24 weeks is the threshold for viability. Women who get abortions after 12 weeks do so due to delayed recognition, health risks to the mother, and fetal abnormalties. She acknowleges none of this.
What is your source, girl? There is no statistical evidence to support this. This is more of a problem with access to healthcare. She's so quick to point the finger and give ignorant opinions on the bodies of others rather. Instead she stays performative.
Yes, it is estimated that around 50% of abortions performed are for those whom this is not their first. Also, it is estimated that at least 50% (majority) of women having an abortion did in fact use some sort of birth control which failed.
This speculated group that Kaylie is referring to of women who use abortions repeatedly and frequently as a form of birth control doesn't really exist statistically. The theorized group of women here who may be frequently using abortion actually pointa to a lack of access to healthcare. The abortions are often paid out of pocket in these situations but for a lot of people it is more affordable than having conventional healthcare.
Lack of access to healthcare is the largest problem here. But let's point fingers and ignore the actual problem. I'm over the performative activism from this broad.
Here's some of my sources and who they collect their statistical data:
Hey so this means that you're not actually pro choice. You are saying that you only agree with bodily autonomy if it aligns with your own beliefs. That's not pro-choice at all.
Ironic considering just weeks ago she shared that she had a suspicion that she was pregnant but did not want to ruin her girl's trip so she waited until she got back to test to find out she actually was pregnant. She was drinking and vaping all weekend knowing this.
Probably is realizing that Snapchat is oversaturated and extremely difficult to monetize. So now she's running back to FB.
Even if she got her following back, idk if she would even be able to be monetized again.
I think she's doing some shady things on her accounts that we don't know about because Facebook twice, then Spotfund, and now Instagram?
Her FB got banned bc she was being scammy and doing a cash giveaway and also has collected donations for it. It's always something with her and maybe she needs to realize that she's the problem.
She might be permanently banned from FB which means no more monetization there.
A newborn doesn't need a ton of space and needs to stay close to its mom when it's young. I'm talking a bassinet in the parents' room. Why would the baby need to be put away in a closet? Their room is big enough for a bassinet or even a whole crib.
This is so idiotic of her to even consider.
Also, it would be absolutely ridiculous if they didn't turn their gaming room into a nursery since they have 4 bedrooms. It wouldn't surprise me if they don't.
*First screenshot is a snapshot of her analytics on Social Blade. (Slide 1)
*Next screenshots are of the follower checker on Collabstr to check for analyatics on real vs suspicious/possibly fake followers. (Slides 2,3)
*It's also worth noting that she has an influencer page with Collabstr for brands to reach out to her through them along with quotes for packages. (Slides 4,5,6)
Maybe her views are tanking because she can't afford to keep buying bots... it seems a lot of her comments are bots... just speculating
Also, it's normal for influencers to accumulate a small percentage bots in their following percentage. But not over 30% and a third of someone's followers...
On her Facebook yesterday. Literally HUMANIZING pdfs... (2nd slide)
Of course I was the one who added the strawberry to cover the baby's face... this wasn't necessary to keep in the video and doesn't make her a "relatable mom." I can't stand the genre of content creator moms who think their kids are "fuckass kids" and that pretending to hate them is relatable and "real."
​
This is also sad since she's shared that her youngest was diagnosed with autism and kaylie continues to make it abundantly clear that she favors her other daughter. This is just exploitative and gross and she does this a lot to both her kids, especially her youngest.
​
Her baby daddy is no better for allowing this.