u/flipinchicago

Clients Using LLMs to hyper analyze everything

I've been working with this client for a month now, and we went through the brief, the strategy, the media planning, etc., and then we launched. My POV was that this client was a little demanding, definitely more "sales" focused, and less data-savvy and educated about digital marketing.

Anyways, we launch our campaign (paid social, search) and then all of a sudden, her emails turn into this academic, hyper-analytical essay heavily critiquing our strategy, targeting, creative, marops/tracking, etc.

At first I was like, "Wow, these are good questions, I wish she had asked them earlier in the process," but after multiple back and forths and after it getting so convoluted, I got suspicious. A lot of the questions were hypocritical (for example: we should use broad targeting when they initially said super-specific targeting), and I figured out that, yeah, this is definitely ChatGPT.

In the end, we ended up firing her because she was wasting our time, we followed her/ChatGPT's recommendations, and the campaigns still didn't work.

How are y'all dealing with not-so-smart clients using LLMs to critique your work?

EDIT: I forgot to mention, despite her definitely ChatGPT'd emails, when we were on calls with her, she was nowhere as sophisticated, though I predict this is going to change with meeting recorders and real-time LLM feedback

reddit.com
u/flipinchicago — 1 day ago
▲ 123 r/legal+1 crossposts

Location: Chicago, IL, USA

I got this letter in the mail that seems super sus. I'm not a lawyer, but Bank of America is claiming that because I have a credit card with them ($0 balance, because I hate them but want the credit history), if anything goes wrong, I have to sue as an individual and can't join a class action. Am I wrongly interpreting this?

Shoddy photo from the letter I received (sorry for the wonky dimensions)

u/flipinchicago — 21 days ago