▲ 6 r/TheRestIsScience+1 crossposts

Would this work?

What if grouped people as chunks of 300 people based on geographical location. Then let them elect one person from that group, which will move on to next phase of 300 people who got elected from all different groups. And so on when we reach the final group of the last elected person would be highest office holder, then all other positions can be taken in the last group, and all other positions can be filled by group of people in previous groups. Would that make any difference from current form of democracy?

reddit.com
u/geralt_of_rivia83 — 5 days ago

Would this work?

What if grouped people as chunks of 300 people based on geographical location. Then let them elect one person from that group, which will move on to next phase of 300 people who got elected from all different groups. And so on when we reach the final group of the last elected person would be highest office holder, then all other positions can be taken in the last group, and all other positions can be filled by group of people in previous groups. Would that make any difference from current form of democracy?

reddit.com
u/geralt_of_rivia83 — 5 days ago

Explaining the rules..

When we start playing any game or sport we would like to establish the rules, and make sure that everyone who is playing the game understand them to have fully enjoyable experience. Then why don't we do that for our betterment of our society, why do we leave it to the individuals making up their own stories on how to live. Wouldn't we be better off having single rules define our civilization which might propel ourselves into better future?

reddit.com
u/geralt_of_rivia83 — 20 days ago

Philosophical rant! Not a question.

Here's the thing, we all know this trope in story telling antagonist gets hold of someone beloved or a family friend of protagonist. Then proceeds to blackmail the friend to get info of what the protagonist is planning ahead and try to hinder them. This friend in hopes of trying to save the family member tries to deceive the person who trust them, and help the antagonist get an advantage. In the end the antagonist kills the family member anyway, now this friend is left with nothing better to do than kill himself. Why do we find this compelling story telling, it's like we made up most of our society rules in which the above friend has save their family members by any means necessary (because that's a good person way of doint it) by deceiveing the people who can actually help. Anyway don't know where I am going with this, just wanted to let it out.

reddit.com
u/geralt_of_rivia83 — 22 days ago