u/gothrax1

What if gravity is shared between quickly diverging and diluting timelines?

Ok this is pretty nuts but I've been bugging about this for like a week now, and I think I might have something

If you attribute the expansion of 3D space onto a 6D brane space as well and say timelines are expanding outward at the same rate as space expands, then we would see particles expanding into probabilities just as we do when we look at them closely, they look like a wave of probabilities.

The rules might be like this: timelines branch outward and affect each other's gravity for a bit but move away in 6D space because new timelines which are more similar to ours are constantly being expanded into the area between. But what if there's some geometry to this which allows gravity to pull timelines closer together despite the expansion?

Then the more massive the object the more it can resist the diverging effect of timeline expansion.

We could assume at a micro scale these timelines would separate faster than the gravity between them could pull them back together. But what if you separate timelines for an object massive enough to keep up with the expansion? Like if you put a QRNG onto an asteroid and told it to move around based on the random number results, would you start to detect ghost gravity from an asteroid that wasn't in that same spot on a different timeline? Is that what dark matter is? alternate timeline matter that's heavy enough to stay near our timeline? Does this also mean that Einstein's relativity is saved, and we simply aren't accounting for all the different timelines constantly branching away from ours?

The NIST big G crisis could be caused by a number of things but what if it's this simple? We are experiencing a fraction of gravity from an alternate earth which is overlapping ours? And the reason we don't feel gravity anomalies at our relatively micro scale is because the timeless diverge too quickly.

reddit.com
u/gothrax1 — 8 days ago