u/greald

I think there is going to be an evidentiary hearing within a week or two on the spoliation hearing. This means witnesses on the stand, probably.

Plaintiff was maybe yelled at for over designation confidentiality markings because it leads to a lot of motions for sealing.

Plaintiff have to provide something?? within 24 hours.

SMJ ruling start of September.

If this goes to trial. Early next year is the earliest.

Mere hours after Plaintiff's motion to seal the Declaration of Witness C was approved by the judge, Destiny decided to go "FUCK DA POLICE" and violate her order.

He described both his relationship status and her public moniker, making it trivially easy to identify her.(Cats out of the bag, it was his ex.)

This is worse then the previous breaches where he wantonly violated the Confidentiality designations from plaintiff.

This was an ORDER from the judge to seal the exhibit that contained her information. Judges tend to not like being defied like this.

I'm sure Peters will bring up this little tidbit later today.

Since Destiny seems to have "forgotten".

https://preview.redd.it/cspt45y7zcih1.png?width=733&format=png&auto=webp&s=1387e869582a7e76cede491c45f02fafe2799a16

Lets turn our gaze back to 2012. Where a young, very edgy, middling Starcraft pro got in a lot of trouble for sharing nudes of a fan and sex partner, BlueTea.

Destiny in his quest to coom and show of to his "best mates" shared around nude pictures of a woman he was having sex with in a group chat with two of his online "mates", he also very "charmingly" called her Shrek looking, and ugly.

https://preview.redd.it/sayz87872dih1.jpg?width=1290&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=c52730d5424c2230889f321f2e861c4f387ead2d

This got leaked, the chat, not the images. And Bluetea, understandingly feeling betrayed and denigrated responded by posting his dickpicks on Destiny's own twitter account, which she for some unfathomable reason had access to.

And as is obvious and will be a repeating pattern later in his career, Destiny could not fathom that he did anything wrong. And instead chose to go on a vendetta against his victim trying to get her fired, thrown out of school and have her student aid cancelled.

Since there seems to be problem with actual factual things in this sub. Here's an overview of Destiny current legal trouble in the CURRENT court case that is ongoing in Federal court in Southern Florida.

Anything else is unrelated to his CURRENT court case.

His accuser is claiming the following:

1. He send sexual images without her consent(CARDII)

2. He send sexual images without her consent in order to harm her (§ 784.049)

3. He by doing the above intentionally inflicted emotional harm on her (common-law)

4. And he, again by doing the above, and without good cause, publicized private facts about her.(common-law)

These are the four claims. His accuser is an adult and where an adult when the video where made.

There is a LITERAL FOOTNOTE mentioning that one of the people he was sending the videos to where 17 at the time, hundreds of lawyer hours and thousands of dollars worth of briefs back and forth arguing if this where true. Catfishing, sex trafficking, British pedos etc.

In the end the judge said "I don't care, move on". In Judge speak.

But that's it, when it comes to CSAM sexting with a minor etc.

The actual trial have been moved twice and is currently indefinitely postponed awaiting a hearing on Aug 19th.

Currently there is two motions. A motion for summary judgement where Destiny claims that one of the transmission, he admitted to happening, happened before the CARDII statute went into effect. And that the other transmission did not happen at all. The first is purely on law the second can only be dismissed if there is ZERO evidence that he send the file. (oversimplification).

The other motion and the upcoming hearing is on Destiny's evidence. He self produced a bunch of Discord logs that he claims shows he DID NOT send the video(s) to the second woman.

"Unfortunately" for him, the way he self produced them is not the way you're supposed to collect evidence. You're supposed to use the apps "official" download tools if possible or common known third party tools if not. Immediately HASH your downloads, NOT delete the originals. not on the site or the live files on the servers. And THEN extract the information you want to give to the court.

Instead he used his best friends and coworkers, Dan Saltman's owned tool(REDACT) to do much of it. Deleted the live versions and apparently also deleted the original downloads from the third party tools. Him and his lawyers are EXTREMELY evasive about what happened. They can't be EXTREMELY evasive when a judge asks pointed question on the 19th. There are also artifact that MAY be evidence of tampering in those files AND he STUPIDLY waived around a piece of evidence his lawyer claimed didn't exist on a recent livestream. That is also part of the hearing. There's also missing metadata and a whole host of other smaller things.

IF there is enough evidence that he tried to delete evidence with the INTENT to deprive the woman suing him, he will be punished for this. IF there is enough evidence that the data he deleted could have been useful for the woman suing him, the judge will order a "cure". Even if there is not enough positive evidence for either, the Judge may just discard his evidence and he will not be allowed to use it at trial or at the above mentioned summary judgement.

Destiny PUBLIC defense on the transmission he have, under oath, admitted to, is that he had implied consent. And that she did it to(send files). But neither is likely to be admitted in court. The first is barred by the statutes themselves, the second by "rape shield" laws, these are VERY unlikely to even be allowed in front of a Jury. This is why it's only a defense he uses in public and not in court.

And please for the love of god read what I actually wrote. This is not a "defense" of him. What HE'S been saying to his audience about his own courtcase is a completly different story then what I wrote. He's on an ongoing quest to dox and harass everyone, who does what I just did, accuratly describe his legal troubles.

> PAPERLESS ORDER RESETTING HEARING. A hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal and Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions under FRCP 37(e)(2) for Defendant's Spoliation of Evidence, ECF Nos. 251, 262 is hereby RESET before the undersigned on Wednesday, August 19, 2026, at 1:00 p.m., at the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. Courthouse, Courtroom 11-4, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida 33128. Given that the Motions pertain to evidence central to the resolution of Plaintiff's claims, this matter is hereby removed from its current trial calendar and shall be reset after the Court's ruling. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra on 7/23/2026. (dgj) (Entered: 07/23/2026)

> "PAPERLESS ORDER SETTING HEARING. A hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal and Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions under FRCP 37(e)(2) for Defendant's Spoliation of Evidence, ECF Nos. 251, 262 is hereby SET before the undersigned on Wednesday, July 29, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., at the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. Courthouse, Courtroom 11-4, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida 33128. Given that the Motions pertain to evidence central to the resolution of Plaintiff's claims, this matter is hereby removed from its current trial calendar and shall be reset after the Court's ruling. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra (drn) (Entered: 06/30/2026)"

This means the trial is on hold and will be rescheduled. Because the judge needs to hold a hearing on Destiny's dodgy evidence and his apparent violation of court rules.

This is Destiny being asked. Why should I not apply trial ending sanctions. This is very very very bad for Destiny.

Can he survive? Sure, if he gives some darn good answers at the hearing. But right now he's in trouble. So much trouble the judge doesn't want to initiate the jury selection, because that could be a waste of time.

Background:

As some you may know in early 2025 speed running youtuber Karl Jobst lost a defamation suit to King of Kong infamous "internet personality" Billy Mitchell. Jobst was widely criticized and mocked for this lose. Jobst was overly confident of a win during the case and misleading about what the case was actually about. Turns out that he gave the impression of being sued for claims about Mitchells Donkey Kong high scores, but in reality was sued for accusing Mitchell for contributing to a fellow speed runners suicide.

After his loss Jobst was forced to declare bankruptcy and still owes Billy Mitchell about 700k USD.

So when Jobst filed a defamation suit against Mitchell not only in America, with its more protective free speech laws and in the very complicated Southern District of Florida court, but also as pro se, representing himself:

People roundly mocked him, which was probably deserved.

Jobst is suing for:

Defamation Per Se.

Unauthorized Publication Of Name or Likeness for Commercial or Advertising Purposes.

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress.

Now "proper" filings in the case have dropped. A Motion to Dismiss, and a Motion for Security for Costs. The former being a motion that assumes everything Jobst states in his complaint are true but then argues that he still doesn't have a case. The later is asking the judge to order Jobst to put up 80k before proceeding because he will be unable to cover any of Mitchells costs if he loses due to his bankruptcy.

Now before we proceed, I will mention. A lawyer can write the most well cited and well argued motion or reply in the history of litigation and have their opponent write some half assed, left hand work in opposition and still lose. The merits and the law is what rules and judges are independent experts that are perfectly capable of making up their own minds regardless of arguments from the lawyers. An actual "good lawyer" is often one who doesn't fuck up and make fatal mistakes.

Billy Mitchell initially had two lawyers and a very well renowned firm defending him. While one of the lawyers is his daughter and somewhat green, she appeared to have the institutional backing and support of experienced litigators.

Everyone assumed Jobst would be destroyed.

But that was then.

Now the experienced, battle hardened lawyer has left Mitchell's team, so has the renowned firm. Mitchells daughter is still on the case, but as sole attorney and she appears to have left the firm she was working for when the case started according to their website.

She's posting on twitter, about the case, denigrating Jobst in a case about Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress??. Messes up the her electronic filings. And her motions are bad. Not fatally bad, just below average, broad and boilerplate. and her citations are backfiring on her, in that Jobst is reverse unoing them to make his own case.

Jobst meanwhile is filing some excellent replies. His legal research appears to be competent. His citation is on point and his argument is well made. And he filed the replies in respectively 3 and 6 days, he had 14 days to file. Suggesting he's prepared and has had the research down before even starting the case.

There is still some criticism of Jobst filings, he's a tad to aggressive, federal court really likes professionalism, and one of his arguments about "bad faith" was probably better left out.

Does that mean Jobst wins. No. That is far to early to tell and as I mentioned about the law and the merits, the best arguments can still fail if the underlying facts aren't there. But it's certainly not how most people expected this to proceed.