u/itsamememario4

Can we all agree that we agree to term of service all the time without knowing what's inside of them. They aren't real contract and IMO we should default to what the common reasonable customer's understanding of the exchange is.

If google wants to sell your location data it should tell users that plainly. This would also cut both ways if you don't sign a waver and get hurt at the gym that's on you.

Contracts are agreements between 2 willing parties exchanging goods and services in good faith. EULA are just 300 pages legalise that 99% of users never read. (This means the market doesn't price in terms correctly, random pieces of the contract get thrown out for being too egregious and faith in the companies and the system get erroded)

Anyone has a sense of how the lawsuit against the federal government taking a stake in intel in exchange of grant money that was already promised to intel might go? How likely is it to be deemed illegal?

Assuming it winds up being illegal would the fed just have to give back shares, give money to shareholder of record, give money to intel equivalent to the cost of shares when the fed invested?