i used to be really into K’s teachings. but i’ve since subsided
i read “Total Freedom” recommended to me from someone i met in the park, and they’re REALLY into it and i’m someone who remains very open minded to all possibilities. i surrender to the flow of myself a lot and the unknown. i do not judge or discriminate others for anything at all and do not expect anything from anyone.
there’s some ‘teachings’ that have really rubbed me wrong by this human. i found myself disliking the heteronormative structure still implemented into said words spoken. that is not open. i dislike how this person chooses to detach from their upbringing/culture. stating that tradition or what not is irrelevant in a sense. i argue that knowing your roots and where you come from, is crucial to understanding diversity in communities. we need diversity.
i disliked how he stated he never took drugs and in turn, states that they’re unneeded. wrong again.
there are humans that come into this world, with severe tics, tourette’s, other severe mental/neurological disorders that cannot function without prescribed drugs. he does not specify which drugs. which are granted to us as a tool. not a means for addiction.
there is a difference only you can decipher, but for those who need them to function, they cannot just meditate it away.
i disliked how he advocated for all yet remained vegetarian. if you were truly for “all” you’d be wholly plant based, right? why not go all the way?
you’ve never been sick in your life, great. i argue that that also can happen due to strong genetics and intense caution to germ spread.
i feel there is a severe lack for accepting things as they are presented and more what they want it to be. that is so arrogant and not reality.
please discuss with me further or be open minded as i am. if you argue with me about him being right, i debate that that’s not different than any other religion based structure! which even though he himself renounced that title, the books still show up as “religious” books.
thank you.