Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer (1986) is one of the best serial killer films ever made, and it pulled it off using atmosphere and realism instead of excessive gore
What makes Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer so disturbing is Henry's quiet, polite exterior. That fake mask becomes even more disturbing once you see the brutality he's capable of.
The film's based on the real-life crimes of Henry Lee Lucas and his partner, Ottis Toole. The way Michael Rooker plays Henry gives only a subtle hint of that sick compulsion underneath. Maybe it's in the eyes or the constant stoic expression on his face.
Whatever it is, the performance is deeply unsettling.
Rooker brought that same intensity three years later in Sea of Love (1989).
The film wastes no time showing that Henry's nobody you'd ever want to cross paths with.
What tripped me out is how real it feels. The gore's maybe a 3 out of 10, but it's more brutal because it feels believable. A lot of scenes don't even show the murders themselves. Instead, the film shows the aftermath, dead victims lying on the floor while the camera slowly pans across the crime scene. In the background you hear screams, but Henry's already long gone. The horror of what the victims experienced is left entirely to the viewer's imagination, and that makes it even more shocking.
Every time I watch it, I feel drained afterward. Not because of gratuitous violence which really isn't the case, but because the atmosphere's so heavy and grim the entire way through. John McNaughton's direction ( shot on a $110,000 budget) and brother Robert McNaughton's score adds a lot to that too. It's brooding and it just enhances the dark atmosphere.
This movie never loses its power. I saw it years ago, and it still hits just as hard today. It's a damn powerful movie, and Rooker delivers one of the best performances in horror history. If you love crime/ horror, you need this one in your collection.