Copper peptides (GHK‑Cu, AHK‑Cu)
Does it help to reverse grey hair?
Does it help to reverse grey hair?
After reading through a lot of posts here, I noticed a pattern: many people mentioned that reassessments didn’t go well for them, especially in situations where the worker misunderstood the person’s actual needs. That made me think carefully about whether a second reassessment would be helpful in my case.
Because of that, I decided to go straight to appeal instead of doing another reassessment. It seems like a more structured process, with clearer review of documentation and less chance of being misunderstood during a short conversation.
Just wanted to share in case anyone else is deciding between the two. Appeal feels like the more stable option for me.
Hi everyone, I’m the caregiver for my elderly mom who has dementia. I’m running into a problem with IHSS and I’m hoping someone here has experience with this.
My mom can still speak clearly, but her dementia causes her to give answers that sound normal even when they’re not accurate. She also gets confused, switches languages, or masks symptoms. For people who don’t know her, she can look “fine” for a few minutes even though she needs constant supervision.
The IHSS caseworker keeps wanting to talk to her directly during assessments and phone calls. I’m worried this will mislead them into thinking she doesn’t need protective supervision. I’ve tried explaining that she can’t answer reliably, but I’m not sure how firm I’m allowed to be or what IHSS expects in these situations.
Has anyone dealt with this? How do you handle it when the person with dementia gives misleading answers that make them look healthier than they are? Is it acceptable to tell the caseworker to direct all questions to me?
Any advice or experience would really help.
Thanks.
Hey everyone, I am currently navigating an IHSS appeal in San Diego County fighting to get Protective Supervision for my parent. I am targeting about 154 hours of physical care plus the PS safety block. I have two separate SOC 821 forms that show her rapid clinical decline over the last month, and I wanted to see how you think a judge will view them together: PCP Form (Dated 4/10/2026): Checked "Severe" for Memory and Orientation. For Judgment, they didn't check a box but wrote "Moderately impaired, Poor judgement." However, they documented that she "touches hot ovens and is not aware it's hot" and explicitly ordered that she needs supervision to prevent accidents. Neurologist Form (Dated Today, 5/19/2026): Checked "Moderate" for Memory and Orientation, but officially checked "Severely Impaired" for Judgment. Dr. Khamishon wrote out specific real-world examples: "Found eating raw sugar and entire jar of peanut jam." He also checked "YES" for a history of falls and physical capacity to place herself in danger. Both specialists have treated her for 3 months and both marked her prognosis as "Permanent." Since the PCP shows severe memory/orientation from April, and the brain specialist officially upgrades her judgment to Severe in May after her recent Brain MRI showed Advanced Volume Loss, do you think this timeline is ironclad for winning PS? Has anyone else used two forms that complement each other like this? Appreciate any insight or past hearing experiences!