u/jwlbond

The last 3 weeks I’ve been studying faceless content across YT, Instagram and Tiktok. Hours of screen time and reading a lot of guides and “theories”.

The claim that you can just subscribe to a service that produces AI videos on autopilot, to expect that it will become profitable right away is just false. Yes you can achieve substantial views and reach, but it takes time and most platforms are strict with monetizing AI channels and accounts. So the most realistic way of income with (AI) faceless would be paid promotion and partnerships.

Cracking the code
I’m currently looking for 10 people who already are working on their own faceless channels or intend to do.

What I would like to do is to cover the cost of the production for these channels for X months (maybe 2-3 months - tokens are expensive and I’m not rich), and in return I will be part of growing these channels and test different constructions/builds/formats of content. And also that I have the rights to use these channels as case studies on my website motionflow.io

The goal is to figure out the best format, how much (and what) AI can manage and where it fails.

I’ve already found a lot of pitfalls for AI and how different models perform in terms of quality and precision. This is not easy, but we will figure it together! 😄

EDIT:

4 out of 10 spots filled 🤝

I am building a text-to-video platform, specifically for promo/marketing ads for SaaS companies. The concept in it's essens is that you can prompt a video idea and the engine will generate a marketing ready video including scenes/animations, copy, voice-over and music.

I've tested on bigger SaaS like Stripe, Aikido etc. but would very much like to test on other sites and products. So if you're planning to launch on PH or just need a promo video for your website, it would help me greatly if I can use your product as test cases. To me it's a win win - you get a free video that you can use on PH, your website or/and social media, and I can test edge cases on my platform before I launch next week.

I deliberately haven't included the domain name for my project as I don't want this to be a promotion post. I hope this doesn't violate any guidelines.

Just write your domain name, or comment if interesting to you, and I will reach out.

I have few thoughts about the whole situation with RS and all the negativity in here and about MVIS. I get why long term shareholders are losing faith in MVIS and the current share price development is frustrating as hell.

From what I have read, most shareholders in here would like MVIS to announce their partners by name or concrete revenue deals, which I understand. But try to flip your view from a shareholder to the BoD and management. If you were the underdog in this industry, would think it would beneficial to share these informations? Yes, for shareholders it might be, but from a business standpoint maybe not so good. Why expose more data and information than necessary, that could be an opening for exploits? If I were in Glen's shoes I would buckle down, achieve a longer runway (eg. dilution), build a solid foundation, expand product portfolio and initiate as many partnerships and relationships with potential customers, for then to scale the company to the next levels.

And for the RS, I don't see this as being a shock and a fully justification of the recent decline in price. MVIS has been below $1 for a while now, so a RS is/was expected - long before the proxy announcement. IMO a potential RS would already have been priced-in.

Lastly it seems that Glen and MVIS are trying the best they can to satisfy shareholders with QA sessions, reduction in authorized shares and frequent PR about the business. At least to me it seems.

One last note. I've looked into Glen. He is an expert in his field and an operator with decades of experience. Meaning he has more technical understanding of the products and underlying technology than most CEO have in other industries. Therefore I also believe that Glen has the ability to guide the rest of the company to build superior lidar technology and products. And if you are an underdog with superior products, it might be a good idea to underplay yourself until you are inevitable to the market.

Just my take.