

Another anti-Hezbollah voice criticizing Lebanon's servitude to the U.S.
reddit.comSiniora becomes latest anti-Hezbollah Lebanese figure to criticize the agreement as unacceptable
reddit.comI feel nobody's talking about the most important thing: The need to build our army and our state's strength
We discuss the deals happening, some say we need to accept the Aoun-Salam deal because we're too weak, others say we should accept Iran's help because we're too weak, some criticize the army for withdrawing and others say it should withdraw but we all agree it's too weak, etc.
Regardless of the above and different opinions what we should be talking about it how to build our army and our strength overall. It's not acceptable that we don't have a political decision for sovereign funding of the army instead of leaving it to the US who is arming Israel. If we want to stop being a pawn we need to fund our own army.
We can recuperate the money that the bankers stole, we can put taxes on non-productive sectors (not the productive ones), we can increase gomrok on imported goods that we already produce locally, we can tax the ultra rich. We also have a lot of engineers so we can produce weapons locally. It doesn't need to be as strong as Israel, it just needs to be strong enough to make any occupation costly and to have actual ردع.
Obviously the zo3ama don't want that for a number of reasons: HA wants to keep its own army, LF doesn't care about deterring Israel, and everybody's allied with the bankers we should be taxing. But besides the zo3ama that we already know ma ra7 yotla3 menon shi, is anybody proposing such a plan?
So basically it's the LF-Kataeb deal imposed on all of Lebanon
I checked them all and except for #4 on the left and #18 & 19 on the right which I couldn't find, I can confirm they're correct.
Netanyahu celebrates that unlike the Iran-U.S. deal, the deal it signed with Lebanon today does not force it to withdraw
reddit.comUnpopular opinion on this sub: Yes Hezbollah's relation with Iran is not acceptable, yes Israel is 100% responsible for attacking us
For the very simple reason that all of Israel, ever since it was born, with its "left" and its right, its government and its opposition, its secular and its religious, etc, has clearly said that it wants to occupy Lebanese land and destroy Lebanese society on a confessional basis.
We can criticize the kind of ties Hezbollah has to Iran and the "6 missiles" decision (we must criticize them, I criticize both), but it doesn't make Iran responsible for Israel's enmity to Lebanon. This is ايه بس إنتي شو كنتي لابسة rhetoric.
WTF, why did Aoun thank Iran? We should NEVER thank Iran for its help, it is an occupying state and it should not try to help us!
reddit.comA full resistance is not only against Israel but also against the sectarian regime bowing to Israel and weakening our society
What do you think of Nadim's point? Should we refuse the ceasefire so we can decide to impose it again?
It's actually the exact opposite: There should be a strong Lebanese army, not a vaccuum. BTW it's because the so-called state never cared about Southern Lebanon that Southerners had to fight for themselves outside the state.
Nawaf Salam said that saying Israel wants to disarm Hezbollah is "tijleeta". Does this change mean Israel no longer wants to disarm Hezbollah? Why do you think it dropped this condition?
So we're doing direct negotiations with Israel but indirect negotiations with Iran?! I mean at that point I miss "Iran is as bad as Israel"
I'm not with Hezbollah and I don't care about Iran, I care about society in Lebanon. Israel is occupying our land and ethnically razing our people and fragmenting our society. Iran is fighting Israel for reasons totally unrelated to us. We have an interest in negotiating with Iran to find a common path against Israel, if only temporary. I don't see how this government (that all tawaif support, subhan Allah!) has our society's interests at heart.
Tracy Chamoun, granddaughter of Camille Chamoun and usually a fierce critic of Hezbollah, says that Israel's invasion of Southern Lebanon was actually premeditated. Why did she blame Israel instead of Iran? Did the Iranian occupation buy her?
An extremely important stance from Motran Georges Iskandar, speaking of all "abnaa al janoub" as steadfast in their land. This showcases there is an actual enemy to all of society regardless of our internal sectarian and political differences
When the Blues Brothers play instead of the Good Ole Boys, how come the real band wasn't there on time?
Also, when the real band is there, they don't even know they're late. Is this a mistake in the movie or is there an explanation I missed?
Such commendable efforts are a part of resistance in the full meaning of the word. If we had a real state instead of a sectarian farm such heroic efforts would be organized at state level
Around 1000 Israelis on a post on r/Lebanon. Yesterday the Israeli government said they were playing a direct role in Lebanese media. How do you think we should protect Lebanese society from this?
This is the views on a post of mine showing how Israel is a danger to Lebanon regardless of nationalist or Islamic ideology. 9% of 9800 views is 880 Israelis at least, if we add up some in the US and other locations we can estimate around 1000 Israelis on the post, with a number of them participating, obviously. This is in line with what the Israeli government confirmed they were making use of Lebanese media against Lebanese society as well.
So my question is: How can we protect our society against this?
Note: Please remain on topic instead of using diversion tactics to talk about Hezbollah's mistakes like you usually do whenever there's a post about Israel being a danger.
The enemy army just said that "anyone heading South would be in danger"
Just in case anyone believed Trump or Netanyahu or Aoun that we had a ceasefire.
"How I Realized I Was In a Cult", by Daniel Klein
Daniel Klein describes himself as follows: "I was born in Jerusalem and raised in a West Bank settlement inside religious-Zionism, before dismantling that ideology. I share testimony and witness in service of human liberation."
This is a text entitled "How I Realized I Was In a Cult" on his Substack:
Someone recently asked me, “How would I know that I’m in a cult?”
Honestly, it can be hard to know you are in a high-indoctrination system until you start to break away. That’s the whole point.
But here are seven questions I asked myself:
- When I voice a doubt or disagree, does the group engage with the substance, or do I face social rejection and warnings that my thinking is dangerous?
- Can I explore alternative beliefs or hold conflicting truths without feeling a wave of panic, guilt, or the need to label the outside world as evil?
- Is my sense of being loved and accepted unconditional, or is it entirely tied to my alignment with the group’s narrative?
- When a hard question arises, am I met with an opening that expands the conversation, or a thought-terminating cliché designed to shut it down?
- Does belonging to this group mean inheriting a list of outsiders I am expected to fear, pity, or hate?
- Do I still know who I am when the group isn’t looking, or do I find myself hiding my truth even when I am alone?
- Is leaving framed as a shift in perspective, or am I told that exiting is an act of treason, heresy, or becoming “lost” - a choice that will inevitably destroy my life, soul, or character?
Sitting honestly with these questions was scary. In hindsight, the scariest part wasn’t the cost of leaving. It was realizing the cost of staying inside.
שאל
سَأَلَ