Built a sign-up widget that collects zero user data. Yes, that makes it commercially worthless, now open source.

I built a sign-up system that doesn't collect a single piece of personal data. No email. No password. No phone number. Nothing.

It's called Wisp - anonymous, email-free accounts a real person can return to. Drop a script tag on your site, and your users can create an account with a passkey, a copyable code, or just a guest session. The server stores a random ID and a public key or code hash. That's it. Nothing to leak because there's nothing there.

Here's the part where I'm supposed to pitch you on why this is the future. It's not. I know that.

The entire internet runs on a simple equation: you get a free service, they get your data. Every sign-up form with an email field isn't just authenticating you - it's the first step in a profile that gets sold, shared, breached, and sold again. Companies don't ask for your email because they need it to log you in. They ask because your email is the skeleton key that links you across their analytics, their ad network, their "partners," and eventually some database dump on a forum somewhere. We all know this.

Wisp breaks that equation. And that's exactly why almost nobody will use it.

Think about it. If you're a business, what does Wisp offer you? Anonymous users you can't retarget. No email list to sell to a "growth partner." No cross-platform identity graph. No way to spam them about a feature they didn't ask for. Just... people using your site. The horror.

So who is this actually for?

The small indie dev who runs a forum and genuinely just needs "can this person come back to their posts." The person building a poll site who doesn't want to become a data custodian. The hobbyist who knows that the best way to protect user data is to never have it in the first place.

What it actually does (honestly):

  • User's browser solves a small proof-of-work puzzle (bot filter - not a wall, just a cost)
  • User picks: passkey, copyable account code, or guest session
  • Server stores a random user ID + public key or code hash. No email. No IP. No fingerprint.
  • When they come back: same passkey or code, same account. That's the whole promise.

What it will never claim:

  • "One account per person" - impossible without an identity anchor, and anyone who says otherwise is lying or fingerprinting you
  • "Stops all bots" - the proof-of-work raises the cost, it doesn't build a wall
  • "Replaces real auth" - if you need verified identity, this isn't your tool

It's free, MIT-licensed, self-hostable, and the entire honesty contract is in the README, including a claims table that says exactly what it can and can't do, with confidence labels instead of marketing promises.

I built the widget we all wish was just a normal part of the internet. It isn't, for reasons we all understand. But it exists now, and it works, and if you're one of the few people who actually don't need your users' data — here it is.

Links in comments.

note: Email Required to try it...

^jk obviously

TL;DR: Drop-in sign-up widget. No email, no password, no data collected. Passkey, code, or guest. Free, open source, self-hostable. Nobody will use it because there's no data to sell.

reddit.com
u/legitslei — 2 days ago
▲ 0 r/claude

Does Claude have a genuine reason for working this way? Or just another way to steal?

I’m genuinely confused whether the way Claude handles this has a valid reason behind it or if it’s just another way to squeeze more money out of users.

My new weekly limit started two days ago, and even though that’s not my main complaint, I’ve already used 50% of it. On top of that, I had to pay for my monthly subscription today, only to find out that the weekly limit doesn’t reset when a new billing month begins.

So now I’ve paid for another month, yet I still have to make it until Friday with only 50% of my weekly limit remaining.

I honestly think that’s ridiculous. How is that justified? Has it always worked this way, or is this a newer change? Because from a user’s perspective, it feels like I’m getting ripped off after paying for a fresh month while still being stuck with a half-used weekly allowance.

How do people feel about this, haven’t seen much discussion around it.

u/legitslei — 28 days ago
▲ 544 r/mexico

Varios dulces en México ya saben a puro químico

Random thought, pero neta no sé si siempre han sabido así estas cochinadas, pero nomás abro la bolsa de los Pelonetes y madres… siento que abrí un botecito de Play-Doh, literal. Y los Skittles me saben como metálicos. Definitivamente no sabían así antes; nadie era más fan que yo, les aseguro eso. Pero ahora ya no los disfruto para nada, y así ha sido estos últimos añitos con varios dulces más que antes me encantaban.

¿Qué está pasando? ¿Soy yo o sí los andan empeorando? No me saben así los skittles en usa

Edit: Para mi gente diciendo que mejor dejar de comer esos dulces. Abrense perros no entienden la vibra alch

Y todos entendemos a que me refiero con que sabe a químicos, dejen de joder lmao

u/legitslei — 1 month ago

LPT: The one best habit people rarely practice anymore

Not criticizing anyone, but it’s mind blowing how many people never sit down and simply think about what’s going on in their lives for even an hour a day.

It feels like everyone is on autopilot, jumping from one thing to the next. Being alone isn’t the same as being present with your own thoughts. There’s so much happening in our lives that I can’t imagine not taking time to reflect on conversations I’ve had, how I felt, what I want next, what could be improved, and all the random thoughts that surface when you actually slow down a bit.

I’ve noticed that even after arguments, debates, or meaningful discussions, many people don’t go home and process any of it. They just move on to the next distraction. Ironically, the people who could benefit most from reflection are often the least likely to do it.
Some of my best decisions didn’t come from advice or productivity hacks, they came from sitting still long enough to notice patterns in my own behavior.

If sitting alone with your thoughts feels difficult, that might be a sign to start practicing it. Ignoring yourself only works for so long before it catches up with you. And it doesn’t have to be meditation or anything structured, just no music, no phone, no podcasts or wtvr, just you and your own thoughts for a bit.

Edit: A couple of people asked where I got the idea that many people don’t do this. If you want to do one simple test yourself, try asking your friends and family whether they actually do it on a daily basis. Some might say they do even if they don’t, and of course some genuinely will, I’m not saying nobody does, but more often than not, you’ll notice otherwise.

reddit.com
u/legitslei — 2 months ago