u/mariamkh_

Please read and pay attention to every detail i write in this because this is one of the most bizarre and disturbing cases of the country georgia. The whole country is actively trying to solve this case with their own contributions to finally find the truth and help a single mother who has been searching for her only son for the past 12 years.

The Case of Gurika Dadianidze

In 2014, 17-year-old Guram “Gurika” Dadianidze disappeared during a trip to Lomisa in the Dusheti municipality of Georgia. More than a decade later, his whereabouts remain unknown, leaving his family and the public searching for answers.
Gurika had traveled to the area with a group of friends for the Lomisa religious festival. According to reports, the group eventually returned to Tbilisi, but Gurika was not among them. His disappearance immediately raised questions about what had happened to him after he became separated from the others.
For years, his family continued searching for information about his whereabouts. Despite the passage of time, no definitive explanation of what happened to Gurika has been established.
👉**🏼A New Developmen**t
A journalist called Taia Gamtenadze has visited Gurikas mother and filmed a report video about the whole case and posted it on her Youtube channel.
Since then,with the help of influencer Eleniko Rukhadze and basically,the whole country (among with a lawyer) has been searching for the lost boy.
In August 2026, a video reportedly recorded at Lomisa resurfaced and attracted renewed attention to the case. The recording contains a voice that some people believe could belong to Gurika. His mother, Sopho Bibilashvili, said that she recognized her son’s voice in the footage.

The video reportedly contains someone calling out the name “Kakha” and words that may sound like a request for help. However, the authenticity of the recording—and whether the voice actually belongs to Gurika—has not yet been conclusively established.

The recording has reportedly been submitted for forensic examination. The results could potentially provide important information about the circumstances surrounding Gurika’s disappearance.

Twelve Years Without Answers

Gurika Dadianidze’s disappearance has remained an unresolved mystery for more than twelve years. For his family, the central question remains the same:
What happened to Gurika, and where is he now?

The newly surfaced footage has brought renewed public attention to the case and raised the possibility of finding previously unknown information. Nevertheless, until the recording is professionally examined, it is important not to treat speculation surrounding it as established fact.

For Gurika’s family, however, even the possibility that the footage could contain his voice represents a potentially significant development in a case that has remained unanswered for so many years.

The search for the truth continues.

The Disappearance of Guram “Gurika” Dadianidze.

In 2014, 17-year-old Guram “Gurika” Dadianidze disappeared during a trip to Lomisa in Georgia. Twelve years later, he has still not been found, and the circumstances surrounding his disappearance remain unresolved

What makes the case particularly troubling is not simply that Gurika vanished in a mountainous area at night. It is the number of unanswered questions surrounding the people who were with him that night,including accounts that appear to have changed over the years.

What Happened That Night?
Gurika traveled to Lomisa with a group of young people for the religious festival. According to accounts that circulated after his disappearance, the group eventually began making its way back.

One of the central versions of events was that Gurika sat down on a rock and told the others to continue, saying that he would catch up with them.

That explanation has become one of the most controversial parts of the case.

According to recent reporting, however, at least one person who had previously given an account consistent with this version later told Gurika’s mother something different — reportedly saying that they had never actually seen Gurika there. When his mother questioned the change, the explanation reportedly amounted to: “I don’t know.”

That contradiction is significant. It does not, by itself, prove that anyone harmed Gurika or deliberately lied. But it raises an obvious question:

Why did the account change?

The People Who Were With Him

The people who accompanied Gurika have faced renewed scrutiny because of inconsistencies reportedly found between their accounts.

Recent online discussions and media reports describe multiple people from the original group being questioned again, with claims that some statements do not completely match earlier versions of events.

One particularly important issue concerns the exact moment when Gurika was last seen.

If the original account is correct, Gurika was left behind voluntarily and was expected to catch up with the group. But if that account is inaccurate, then the timeline of his disappearance could be completely different.

That distinction matters enormously.

A person disappearing alone in the mountains is one scenario. A person disappearing after an argument, confrontation, accident, or other event involving people who were with him is another.

At present, there is not enough verified evidence to say which scenario occurred.

“Kakha” — The Name Heard in the New Recording

A newly resurfaced video has added another disturbing element to the case.

The recording reportedly contains a male voice saying words interpreted as:

“Kakha, don’t leave me, please.”

Gurika’s mother, Sopho Bibilashvili, says she recognizes the voice as her son’s. Her lawyer, Tariel Kakabadze, has also brought attention to the recording.

However, the recording’s authenticity and the identity of the person speaking have not yet been conclusively established. It therefore cannot currently be treated as proof that Gurika was alive at the time the video was recorded or that a particular person was responsible for anything that happened to him.

Nevertheless, the name Kakha is potentially important because it corresponds to a person associated with the group and has become part of the questions surrounding the case.

According to accounts circulating about the case, Kakha has maintained a different position about Gurika’s fate, including the possibility that Gurika left and remained alive. These claims should be treated as allegations and reported statements rather than established facts.

Why Are the Changing Stories So Important?

In a missing-person investigation, witnesses do not necessarily remember events perfectly. Twelve years is a very long time, and people can misremember details without intentionally deceiving investigators.

But when accounts concern the last known moments of a missing teenager, discrepancies become especially important.

Some of the questions that remain include:
Who was the last person to actually see Gurika?
At what exact time was he last seen?
Was he really sitting alone on rock?
Why did one person’s account reportedly change?
Who was using the phone that allegedly appeared in photographs from that night?
Who was “Kakha” in the reported audio?
When and where exactly was the new video recorded?
Why were the people who were with Gurika unable to provide a definitive explanation for what happened to him?
Were all relevant witnesses questioned again as new information emerged?

None of these questions proves criminal involvement. But together, they demonstrate why Gurika’s family continues to demand answers.

The Family’s Fight for Answers

Gurika’s mother, Sopho Bibilashvili, has spent years trying to determine what happened to her son.

In June 2026, she publicly called for renewed investigation and for the area to be searched with specialized equipment. She has repeatedly emphasized that she wants to find her child, regardless of whether he is alive or deceased.

Her position is important: she is asking for answers, not publicly declaring that a particular person is guilty.

That distinction matters because there is currently no publicly established evidence proving that any of Gurika’s companions killed him, abducted him, or deliberately concealed his whereabouts.

A Case Still Without a Conclusion

The newest developments do not provide a definitive answer. Instead, they make the unanswered questions even more important.

If the new recording is authentic and the voice is proven to be Gurika’s, investigators could potentially gain a new piece of evidence about his final known movements. If witnesses’ statements genuinely contradict one another, those discrepancies also deserve careful examination.

But suspicion is not proof.

The people whose accounts have attracted attention should not be declared responsible without evidence establishing their involvement. The proper question is not “Who is guilty?” but rather:

“What actually happened to Gurika Dadianidze, and why have the people who were closest to his final known movements been unable to provide a consistent account?”

Twelve years later, that question remains unanswered.

And until Gurika is found or reliable evidence establishes what happened to him, the case remains an open mystery one in which every contradiction, every witness statement, and every newly discovered piece of evidence could matter.

---