Login

u/mikeymikemikey33

r/OSINT r/craftofintelligence r/masskillers r/cults
A 15-year-old is accused of a chemical attack on his school. The FBI found 764 on his devices, and the Com publishes manuals that list schools as targets.
▲ 38 r/cults

A 15-year-old is accused of a chemical attack on his school. The FBI found 764 on his devices, and the Com publishes manuals that list schools as targets.

On September 8, a 15-year-old student allegedly released toxic gas in the cafeteria at Benson Polytechnic High School in Portland. More than 100 students and staff were assessed at the scene. He now faces 19 charges, including attempted murder and domestic terrorism. At his hearing this week, prosecutors disclosed that the FBI had found numerous references to 764 on his devices.

764 is part of a loose online ecosystem called the Com, which recruits heavily among teenagers and runs on coercion, status and control. Groups inside it publish operational manuals, and I examined three. One contains a target-selection table listing schools alongside houses of worship and public transport, with suggested methods for each, including a cafeteria attack.

No public evidence connects the teenager to these specific documents, and the gas he allegedly tried to produce doesn't appear in them. The piece is explicit about where the evidence runs out.
https://redpillreversal.substack.com/p/a-teen-is-accused-of-a-chemical-attack

u/mikeymikemikey33 — 11 days ago
▲ 31 r/masskillers

I went through the Telegram and Reddit history of Jonathan Kramer, the Pennsylvania man charged in an alleged ISIS attack plot. The ISIS label doesn't tell the whole story.

The FBI arrested 21-year-old Jonathan Kramer on September 12 after agents say he obtained a rifle and prepared for a mass-casualty attack on behalf of ISIS. The affidavit focuses on his ISIS-framed activity, and that evidence is serious.

But I went through a 2023 export of the Telegram group he administered, plus the 2026 Reddit activity from the accounts the FBI ties to him, and the picture is a lot messier:

  • Bomb manuals and a threat ("preparing for something big… youll see in 3 months") posted minutes before he shared an ISIS nasheed and went back to sex jokes
  • Christchurch and Buffalo shooting footage, Nazi-themed memes, and occult imagery alongside the jihadist content
  • Hamas propaganda and ISIS nasheed edits posted as "slop" on the same day in 2026, even though ISIS considers Hamas apostate
  • A post about a mushroom trip the day after his ISIS persona said he "wasn't a member"

None of this means the ISIS evidence isn't real. But ISIS looks like one identity among several. The pattern fits nihilistic violent extremism (NVE) better than a clean ISIS story.
https://redpillreversal.substack.com/p/what-the-isis-label-misses-about

u/mikeymikemikey33 — 23 days ago
▲ 173 r/OSINT

OSINT professionals: watch out for this recruitment approach

I want to share something that happened to me recently, because I'm worried other OSINT people may have been approached the same way.

Cold LinkedIn approach about an "intelligence collaboration," followed by a ~10-minute interview with someone who kept her camera off. On the call, the work was described as involving ransom and human-trafficking cases.

What arrived was a "supplier evaluation": build a full protective-intelligence dossier on a named private individual and his family — children, home details, travel patterns, aircraft, credential leaks. Labelled a "fictionalized composite," but specified in enough real-person detail to be resolvable. Produce the full report first — pricing only after delivery.

I asked two questions: who is the end client, and can you confirm the subject consented to being assessed. The reply called my scope question a "misunderstanding," named no client, confirmed no authorization, and redirected me to producing methodology and deliverables.

The LinkedIn accounts and the websites representing the company all seem fake to me. It might just be a scam — but then why did they want me to find personal details on someone I believe is a real person? The company was recently created, with a template website making claims its actual footprint doesn't support, and it turned out to be one of several thinly built companies registered to the same person.

I declined. Posting because the shape is worth recognising: vague inbound from accounts that look fake, an interviewer who wouldn't identify herself, scope sliding from a sympathetic label into a targeting-shaped brief on a private family, hidden client behind an "evaluation," and a full report demanded before any discussion of payment.

If you've had something similar, I'd like to hear it — DMs open.

reddit.com
u/mikeymikemikey33 — 3 months ago