Things that you can hear in academia about indigenous people
Things that people who see themselves as educated and open-minded will say:
- why you use metods such "literaly anthropology for -ethnic- literature?
- *points you out to others* "you see, now all [indigenous peoples] are educated, they can study themselves"
- "well, you know, they didn't take over the land, they just could put up a house and a farmstead on the nomadic routes"
- "backward people"
- "_ khan is not your relative?" ("genius" joke about your surname)
- *it seems like they never specifically uses the self-name of the people, when you only use it, and only uses an name, which can be offensive*
- "are these [indigenous] names a real names???"
- "is this a cultural organization of the [group of indigenous people]? don't you think that this would have something to do with ethnic crime gangs?"
- *explains that this identity does not exist directly in front of the real indigenous person who uses such an identity*
- "do these people still exist?" ("people" ≈300,000+ people)
- "do you even have your own language?"
- *mispronounces the name of an indigenous girl several times, even after she corrects; only begins to correctly pronounce the girl's name after the Slavic [non-indigenous] girl corrects*... etc, etc...
These are small things, of course, but it makes the space so unpleasant... Do you feel like the academic space in your region is like this or is it better or worse?
(All this was said about various indigenous groups of the post-soviet space, for the sake of privacy I will not write about which ones specifically)