u/mrtrimbl

▲ 22 r/IBRX

PSS posts review of the AUA meeting

https://x.com/drpatrick/status/2056807673249898949?s=46

saying "the conclusion that the panelists made that papillary disease and CIS disease is the same was based on the BIOLOGY of the origin of CIS and papillary cancer in the bladder: that papillary and CIS cancer arise from the SAME CANCER GENERATING CLONE, and that CIS (flat) is just a different phenotypic evolution into papillary (the raised form and grape like)"

awesome doc

reddit.com
u/mrtrimbl — 2 days ago
▲ 21 r/IBRX

Anktiva v Tar-200 key points

https://ir.immunitybio.com/news-releases/news-release-details/immunitybio-presents-favorable-comparative-effectiveness-data?field_nir_news_date_value[min]=

A. CR Rate Advantage

ANKTIVA: 69.7%
Nadofaragene: 53.4%
2× odds ratio advantage

B. CR Durability Advantage

ANKTIVA: 22.1 months
Nadofaragene: 9.7 months
2.3× longer durability

C. Cystectomy‑Free Survival

ANKTIVA reduces cystectomy risk by ~60%
→ major quality‑of‑life and cost‑saving benefit

D. Safety Advantage vs TAR‑200

Treatment‑related AEs:
ANKTIVA 61.7% vs TAR‑200 83.5%

This should have rocketed the stock, maybe just need to wait a few days for it to be digested

u/mrtrimbl — 3 days ago
▲ 34 r/IBRX

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2756114

~20% of adults had clinically significant lymphopenia — not just cancer patients

That means immune dysfunction is widespread, under‑diagnosed, and strongly linked to worse outcomes across multiple diseases.

And what does Anktiva do?

It reverses lymphopenia by expanding NK cells + CD8 T‑cells.
It restores immune competence.
It boosts response to vaccines, immunotherapy, BCG, chemo, and radiation.

This isn’t a bladder cancer story.
This is an immune‑system restoration platform story.

The Market Implication: The TAM Is Enormous

If 20% of adults show lymphopenia at any given time, the potential market is staggering.

📌 Global adult population: ~5.5 billion

📌 20% lymphopenia prevalence: ~1.1 billion people

Even if only 1% of these individuals are clinically relevant candidates for immune restoration:

👉 11 million potential patients

At even a $1,000–$5,000 per‑course immune‑restoration therapy:

👉 $11B–$55B TAM

And that’s before adding oncology.

are you staggered yet ? 😁

reddit.com
u/mrtrimbl — 17 days ago
▲ 53 r/IBRX

Mcgill university have seen the light https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-04-unleashing-natural-killer-cells-cancer.html they are pursuing il-2 i believe, but immunity bio is light years ahead imo

also worth noting huggenbergs comment on il-2 in his new immunotherapy2.0 treatise "However, unlike IL-2, IL-15 does not trigger activation-induced cell death or Treg cell proliferation, making it more suitable for cancer immunotherapy" btw you can like and subscribe here as they say https://huggenberg.substack.com/p/fundamentals-of-immunotherapy-20?triedRedirect=true

u/mrtrimbl — 22 days ago
▲ 40 r/IBRX

the uptrend is intact, the company continues to execute incredibly well to go with the incredible data they have and are accumulating, its all good

reddit.com
u/mrtrimbl — 28 days ago