I’ve watched more hockey in the last two years than the previous two decades but I’m still very much learning the sport (I just learned the trapezoid rules today). 

The size difference between Utah and Vegas has been very apparent all series. The size and physicality of Vegas seems to largely over power the speed and skill of Utah. How big of a concern is this for Utah long term? Is Vegas just abnormally huge? Are there examples of teams built around speed and skill rather than size and force winning cups? Does Utah need to find a few bigger players to be more competitive?

Just trying to learn the game and a little history. Thanks!

reddit.com
u/mulrich1 — 2 months ago