Random work thought: Has anyone else noticed that the higher someone is on the org chart, the messier their emails get?
Honestly, it's a bit strange. You'll find they either don't have an email signature at all, or if they do, it's something useless like just initials, and maybe a phone number that no one answers. Half the time, punctuation marks are scattered all over the place. And sometimes they reply to a long, detailed email with "ok" or a single checkmark emoji.
Do people stop caring about email once they have enough people under them? I can't imagine they got promoted over the years while communicating in writing like this.
Of course, this isn't everyone. I've seen plenty of junior people with very bad email habits, and I've seen senior people who write clear, respectful, and useful messages.
But in general, am I the only one who has noticed this pattern?