u/pr-mth-s

website 'The Conversation' writes about last month's White House OSTP plan for a new Golden Age of Science

website 'The Conversation' writes about last month's White House OSTP plan for a new Golden Age of Science

Here. Maybe it is just jibber-jabber.

>White House plan for a ‘golden age’ of science ignores the structures that made the US a scientific superpower

Anyone interested could just read it. The plan is from last month. The article gives 2 POVs.

White House

>eight decades of science policy that helped make the United States the world’s scientific leader is too bureaucratic, too focused on institutions rather than individual researchers, and too slow to translate discoveries into economic and technological advantage.

meanwhile the CDC, DOE, EPA, NIST, NOAA, Ag & USGS etc in effect argue that existing scienctific institutions

>conduct and support science that informs decisions affecting public health, environmental protection, energy security, economic development and public safety. Many of these activities generate public benefits that market forces alone are unlikely to adequately provide.

My opinion: both fail to mention the root cause. Which is that while this culture once had 'the habit of truth', it no longer does. Not just with Science but with everything. Too many people do not care if claims are true or false. People fudge mentally. [I would give examples but they might piss people off.]

And why shouldn't people have this attitude? All is post-modern, everyone has an egos and allies with matching vested interests. The winds of misinformation have reached near gale intensity, and sweep over the cultural lanscape. And yet both POVs expressed by The Conversation expect a new 'golden age of science' to be born out of this.

u/pr-mth-s — 1 day ago

Uneasy Money in .docx on filebin. Out of copyright, I guess this is okay

PG Wodehouse wrote it around 1930.

It seems the only text form available for free is U of Georgia, but straight text is not maybe easy to read. Project Gutenberg doesnt even have a pdf. I figure someone might want a .docx because of readabilty and adjustability of presentation.

Arbitrarliy here it is Times New Roman, 12 pt. 0.04 between paragraphs. .. It has first line indents .. Claire's letter is in italics (which one cannot do for a .txt file) .. the word count seems a bit off for some reason.

This docx is at a website called filebin, and it expires there in 6 days.

reddit.com
u/pr-mth-s — 29 days ago

Manhattan Contrarian thinks China's wind power is stupid

Since I am in totally honest mode and at this moment and do not give a shit about tact let me post about 'Manhattan Contrarian'. He has been one the best climate policy analysts. I have learned a lot from him. a NYC lawyer, he subscribes to the NYTimes. Yet he has gone over the deep end. on May 6th he posted something IMO is batshit crazy (not his normal mode, at all).

It takes him a few paras to warm up . he starts with two recent NYTimes articles. One praises China wind, and the other disses it. MC frames it that this contradiction means he is smarter (than the company he pays money to get his news). not just them, either. MC goes on how Xi is a 'moron'. He uses the sarcastic 'sorry'. He claims Xi Xinping by whim for no reason a few years ago committed China to big investment in wind power, and that this was so stupid, not only does it prove XI is a dictator. but that soon it will turn out to be so expensive, everyone in the world will see this.

MC is sure China should have stuck to building ICE cars and importing oil (apparently because he thinks the world is a wonderful place filled with saints, who would never cut off this supply).

I do not blame MC for not knowing monetary systems, for not reading US think tanks' policy papers over the last ten years, not understanding the real reasons for the current Iran war. Or even for not understanding averages (that the UK stupidly putting turbines in the Scottish highlands has little relevance to China putting turbines in their NW deserts). I do not blame MC for this because MC's focus has helped him focus on what he was good at (with a side effect that he lacked the time to understand geo-politics).

but even so, MC should be aware as he was typing his article the Gulf of Hormuz is closed! what is that 20-30 of fossil fuels? That Venezuela oil is no longer available to China. which shows that China pivoting a few years ago to energy in their own country was not at all stupid. Their wind is under their control. MC even throws shade on China building the new-style coal plants. Why they would do both does not occur to MC.

tldr: do not live in the past. do not make arguments as if Time had not moved on. Do not attempt things, that would have killed in the past but are lame in the present.

u/pr-mth-s — 3 months ago