I’m an idiot who didn’t apply for PSLF forgiveness on payment 120 and am since long removed from public service. Options?

Please don’t argue about the premise of contract work satisfying PSLF. Usually it doesn’t, yes. My work did. I know. 100%. Everything else here works- timing, repayment plan, consolidation timing. SO WITHOUT FURTHER ADIEU

As a solo attorney, I was a contract public defender with the government, meeting 30hr threshold for enough years that between my work there and at the state public defender, I have 120 qualifying payments. Because I was living under a rock, I didn’t realize that the 2023 rule making on contractors made MY PARTICULAR AGENCY count as a qualified employer. So I haven’t certified the last seven of 10 years I could. Obviously, I also didn’t apply at the time on payment 120 (before SAVE injunction) and built a firm, letting the court appointments wane since then.

Everything I can find says that when I apply I have to be with qualified employer. That ship has sailed for a lot of reasons. I see two proposed solutions:

  1. shut down my law practice to take some government job (just take my word for it- rolling back to taking court appointments is worse for business than outright shutting down a few months).

  2. Certify 118 and buy back an old couple months when my stupid loan server talked me into forbearance many years ago.

What is door number 3??

I feel like I should just slam my loans in forbearance one way or another.

reddit.com
u/rillettesmaster — 8 hours ago
▲ 0 r/PSLF

I’m an idiot (redux)

Ok, I posted this but everyone wanted to argue with my premise about contracting. Yes. 100%. Everything else here works- timing, repayment plan, consolidation timing. No arguing with the premise. SO WITHOUT FURTHER ADIEU

As a solo attorney, I was a contract public defender with the government, meeting 30hr threshold. I didn’t realize that MY PARTICULAR AGENCY counted as a qualified employer. I know 100% it does. Between that work and time at the state public defender, I’ve got 120 payments made during 120 months. All payments w 30hr week average. I didn’t apply at the time on payment 120 (before SAVE injunction) and built a firm, letting the court appointments wane since then.

I see two proposed solutions:

1. shut down my law practice (in effect killing it) and go be a bus driver for a couple months.

2. Certify 118 and buy back an old couple months when my stupid loan server talked me into forbearance many years ago.

What is door number 3??

I feel like I should just slam my loans in forbearance one way or another.

reddit.com
u/rillettesmaster — 9 hours ago
▲ 35 r/PSLF

I’m an idiot- didn’t know I had qualifying employer.

Nobody told me that the organization (as a contractor) I worked for was a qualified employer until an old buddy talked about his loans being forgiven. I’ve got 120 payments made during 120 months. I didn’t apply.

The spread of nonsense I’ve read says you must work for a qualifying employer when you apply. I’ve tried to find answers.

Does that mean I need to quit my job and go be a bus driver for a month?

And if not, is there any reason that I shouldn’t go into forbearance while I get the certification sorted out?

reddit.com
u/rillettesmaster — 20 hours ago
▲ 82 r/ProsecutorTalk+1 crossposts

Lab tester pleads to 20 years of altering criminal DNA testing results. What does justice require to make it right?

A head DNA lab tester was caught having been fudging numbers on the tests for maybe 20 years. One thousand one hundred cases have been identified as possibly affected. She pled guilty last week. In her confession, it seemed that she wasn’t doing this with malice. She was just overworked and cutting corners. Just from YOUR own moral compass, what does ‘Justice’ demand?

Only re-testing if defendant can show it would have mattered? Full retesting per se and open release?

Open file discovery for all affected? Only discovery as to that defendant?

You know that there will be a decent amount windfalls secured by defense attorneys with the most liberal approach. You know wrongful convictions, probably just a handful, may result from poor litigation because of limitations on showing it mattered to retest or developing relevance by blindfold on the whole shebang.

What’s the move?

Edit to add CPR article (also update- she was caught fudging in twenty years ago. You’d have to read the 70 page affidavit of PC)

https://www.cpr.org/2026/04/27/legislation-missy-woods-scandal-defense-attorney/

https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/23/us/missy-woods-colorado-dna-analyst-guilty-plea

https://cbi.colorado.gov/news-article/colorado-bureau-of-investigation-releases-internal-affairs-report-into-former-forensic

u/rillettesmaster — 8 days ago