u/robserious21

KOSS has already been handed the same overvaluation opportunity twice.

2021 and 2024.

Twice, the stock experienced enormous increases in price and volume. Twice, the market temporarily valued KOSS dramatically higher than normal.

And twice, the company captured essentially none of that temporary valuation through a primary equity offering.

KOSS insiders did sell personal shares during these periods, they clearly saw the opportunity but I fear they don’t know how to properly capitalize on it, or more-so were not prepared.

That is exactly why KOSS should file an S-3 shelf registration now.

An S-3 is not an offering.

It does not issue shares.

It does not dilute shareholders immediately.

It registers securities ahead of time so KOSS has the ability to raise capital quickly if another opportunity appears.

Once the shelf is effective, KOSS could establish an ATM program. An ATM allows the company to instruct a broker to sell newly issued shares directly into normal market trading at prevailing prices.

Management then controls the trigger and the 10 million unauthorized shares become ammo to sell at $20.

If KOSS is trading at $4 or $5 and management doesn’t think issuing shares makes sense, it can sell nothing.

If KOSS suddenly runs several hundred percent on enormous volume again, management can choose to sell a relatively small number of shares at those elevated prices and put the cash directly onto KOSS’s balance sheet.

That distinction matters.

The goal isn’t indiscriminate dilution.

The goal is to exchange the least possible ownership for the greatest possible amount of capital when the market temporarily offers KOSS an unusually favorable price.

This would raise the floor.

It would convert temporary, speculative highs into permanent corporate resources: cash, stronger liquidity, greater financial flexibility, and a more durable valuation foundation. It would solidify the temporary high valuations that KOSS executives and insiders were able to see for themselves by giving the company—not just individual shareholders—the ability to benefit from those prices.

KOSS didn’t have that tool ready in 2021.

It didn’t have it ready in 2024.

There is no reason to be caught unprepared a third time.

Shareholders need the board to file the S-3 now.

Let the registered capacity sit unused.

If nothing happens, nothing changes.

If KOSS runs again, this time the company can actually capture some of the value having been prepared with the s-3 and atm already in place.

*This is not the time for silence or hesitation.*

Shareholders need to request preparation of these levers. The run ups come and go, but good practices can make the value remain.

KOSS management: if you see this, please hear my cry to file the S-3. Establish the ATM. Put the company in a position to capitalize on the next surge instead of watching another temporary valuation disappear.

The next run should raise the floor—not just create another short-lived spike for personal profits.

-Serious

Where is THE DRS GUY (the person i understand to be a founder of drsgme dot org) when you need a reminder of why are we DRS? Oh hes under NDA with gamestop after being offerer a role.

May i ask, why are “we” DRS?

Direct registration allocates shares instead from listing the brokers name to list the actual shareholders name.

The theory is that this reallocation removes the ability (or lessens the pool of available shares to be used as collateral) to short the underlying by brokers since drs shares are not theirs to fudge numbers on.

At one point there was a thesis that all real shareholders could register the shares held with brokers to prove re-hypothecation was excessive and eventual forced short covering would occur.

Since stock dilutions having expanded the float by multiples and DRS numbers haven’t grown in years, I humbly ask - why does one DRS these days?

There is an argument that I still believe to be true, (although my belief that I’m an idiot has grown in the same amount) that one day brokers will be proven insolvent and anyone who was not DRS would be screwed over.

My counter argument is that, the government would screw over the few DRSd people to save the entire market (and continue the fraud of allowing brokers to continue to over rehypothicate).

This situation evidenced by institutional ownership at or over 120%. (Ebay).

So, if DRS doesn’t to help us, why are “we” doing it?

One reason is not discussed enough is that DRS was promoted because those (supposedly trapped) on the other side of trade gained an advantage from it. Playing devils advocate: what would DRS provide them that they didnt have without it?…. Your name.

If ebay executives were willing to do what they did to a couple with a newsletter. Imagine what they would do to those who could impact their bottom line.

Lastly, the definition of Ape (im not even allowed to say the real word because they banned it) : a person who secretly helps a seller or a con artist by pretending to be a happy customer. They trick other people into buying things or joining a game. The word also works as a verb meaning to promote something for money in a dishonest way. Such as we saw with the leader of drsgme.

I wont be responding its a waste of time in this sub; hear my words or dont. Good luck.

Staplegate was a 2025 event where a gamestop “accidentally” stapled a product through the packaging and ruined it.

Gamestop turned this incident into a positive by auctioning off the product stapler etc on ebay.

The proceeds were donated to Children’s Miracle Network charities.

The dates of Staplegate and the bid for ebay have similarities.

*The incident - stapled product - 05Jun2025*

*One year later - 05Jun2026 - Ebay bid is revealed. *

If he got the idea to buy ebay while on the toilet in febuary of 2026, then staple gate was just an auction and nothing more. That is, if you believe that narrative…

The information lately from interviews has shed light on the early acquisition days of gamestop by RC and the story is that … well he didnt have a plan for gamestop.

I think this is part of the shuffle. Rc convinces you he never had a plan, but the Kansas city shuffle means he actually did… the whole time.. like all the way back to the nft marketplace, immutable, poopring, all of it.

Rc is not the type of person to dump on people he just fired, it doesnt make sense to me, it doesnt pass my sniff test. Hes a memster yes, but not insensitive. Under the shuffle context, it all makes sense.

Im not saying im back on the kool aid - i want to see stock value - 5 years is too long and we are literally selling pet rocks (collectables with no actual value)

but im not going to be surprised if he is going for the full pie and taking on steam by creating a market place for game items. This also explains why rocket league removed trading which im also salty about (in preparation to align with the new marketplace standards).

Fingers crossed gta6 is the reveal.

If not, every other company probably should team up because gamers will flock to gta and leave every other platform.

I think its all preplanned because:

Look at the case the stapler is in. Its a practically a psa case. Look on the wall of the psa arcade - rcs underwear in a psa case. And the staplegate dates align. The last one could be done in retrospect (by picking the same date) but the former 2 are telling because they show the idea existed before February.

The date he offered his underpants into the deal? 25Jun25 (ie today one year ago).

Gamestop will take stuff sold on live auctions and authenticate it, help package and send it for the sellers thats the claim.

But also, that item will have a digital representation too - an in game item. If you are awarded the digital version, you can have it shipped to you or stored in the vault.

Why cant you play pokemon the card game with your friends over the internet? Why cant loot boxes in games sometimes give real items… like an arcade.

Maybe he has had a plan since day one.