u/ryanmiles1990

Robotics Is Starting To Look Like An Actual Investable Asset Class

Robotics Is Starting To Look Like An Actual Investable Asset Class

Something interesting is happening with robotics right now. The conversation is shifting from cool machines and demos to how these companies actually reach public markets.

The Robot Report is looking at SPACs, reverse mergers and other non-traditional routes robotics companies are using to access public capital. At the same time, Crunchbase says 40 companies joined its Unicorn Board in July, the highest monthly count in 4 years, with AI and robotics sitting inside that capital wave.

Now look at mining. CiDi says it has already shipped 1,900 autonomous mining trucks. That's physical AI working around actual dirt, rocks and heavy machinery at industrial scale.

This is exactly why I'm watching $NRED's EyeX situation so closely.

EyeX is built around computer vision for the physical world, including cameras, drones, vehicles, robots and thermal feeds. In a mine increasingly filled with autonomous equipment, that kind of perception layer becomes pretty damn interesting. Machines still need visibility, hazard detection, equipment tracking and real-time understanding of what's happening around them.

And NRED is currently evaluating EyeX while already building MetalCore on the exploration side with 4.1M+ geological records.

MetalCore helps make the geology smarter.

EyeX could help make the physical mine smarter.

With robotics attracting serious capital AND autonomous mining equipment already scaling into the thousands, I'm starting to think the EyeX angle could become one of the more important pieces of the NRED story.

u/ryanmiles1990 — 6 days ago

Copper exploration is getting more interesting at NRED

The latest update from NRED is exactly the kind of exploration news I like to see - not another generic "highly prospective" headline, but a specific geophysical target that can actually be tested.

At the Lamont Grid, NRED has confirmed a buried resistivity anomaly at roughly 200-400 metres depth and defined a 42-hectare chargeability target around 300 metres below surface. Even more interesting, the target remains open to the north, giving the company room to expand the survey and better define the system.

What makes this more compelling is the context. Just days earlier, the company reported up to 1.67% copper from Wilmac samples and an updated geological model identifying multiple porphyry targets about 10 km from Copper Mountain. The latest IP/AMT work adds another layer to that picture.

This is still exploration, so the drill bit has the final say. But the progression is becoming pretty interesting - surface copper, intrusive-system interpretation, alteration, magnetic signatures and now a large deep chargeability target.

For me, this is where a junior explorer starts becoming much more interesting. The question is no longer simply whether there is a target at Wilmac. It's whether NRED can turn these targets into a discovery.

u/ryanmiles1990 — 7 days ago

Two NRED Advisors We Seriously Don't Talk About Enough and why they matter.

NRED's AI people and political names get most of the attention, but Ed Kostenski + Col. Mark A. Calabrese might be one of the more interesting combinations on the advisory bench right now.

Kostenski brings roughly 4 decades around mining finance, infrastructure, heavy equipment and international trade, including experience connected to the U.S. Export-Import Bank. That's experience around the actual machinery, capital and infrastructure required once a mining project starts moving beyond maps and models.

Then you have Calabrese bringing the military and defense side. And that angle matters more now than it did even a few years ago. Copper is increasingly tied to power infrastructure, defense manufacturing, AI data centers and supply security, while China mines less than 6% of global copper but refines and consumes roughly 53%.

Now put those two around what NRED is working with at Wilmac: nearly 39.7k acres, about 6.2 miles from Hudbay's Copper Mountain mine, surface results reaching 1.67% Cu + 0.433 g/t Au, 2 interpreted parent magmas and multiple deeper targets roughly 650 to 1,800 ft below surface.

One guy understands the infrastructure and equipment side of mining. The other brings a defense lens at a time when mineral supply itself is becoming a national-security issue.

I think these are two names on the NRED bench we should be talking about way more.

u/ryanmiles1990 — 8 days ago

1.67% Cu Made Me Stop Scrolling

Okay this is probably the number everyone is gonna notice from today's NRED news.

Wilmac trench samples returned up to 1.67% Cu + 0.433 g/t Au, while 9 grab samples averaged 0.639% Cu. And this is coming from a project sitting only about 6.2 miles from Hudbay's producing Copper Mountain mine.

For some perspective, Copper Mountain currently has roughly 345 Mt of proven + probable reserves grading 0.26% Cu + 0.12 g/t Au. That makes NRED's 1.67% Cu headline number about 6.4x the copper grade, although obviously a trench grab sample and a mine-wide reserve grade are VERY different things and shouldn't be treated as apples to apples.

What gets me more bullish is everything around that number. NRED now has interpreted targets roughly 650-1,800 ft below surface, 2 interpreted parent magmas, multiple pipe/cupola-shaped features, porphyry-style veining + stockwork, and AMT that has already looked roughly 4,900 ft deep.

So yeah, 1.67% Cu is the number that gets clicks.

I'm way more interested in the question it creates:

what the hell is sitting underneath it?

That's what the deeper exploration is gonna have to answer

u/ryanmiles1990 — 9 days ago
▲ 135 r/AmericansInCanada+1 crossposts

Canada Might Have More Leverage Than People Think and That is why Mining Matters most now.

Everyone talks about how much Canada needs the U.S.

Critical minerals make that relationship a little more interesting.

CTV reports Ottawa has discussed reducing preferred U.S. access to Canadian critical minerals and energy if tariff negotiations break down. Copper is already on Canada's critical-minerals list, and the bigger global picture explains why this matters. China mines less than 6% of global copper while refining and consuming roughly 53% of supply. That's a pretty wild concentration for a metal becoming increasingly important to AI infrastructure, power grids, defense and manufacturing.

This is why I've been paying more attention to Canadian copper explorers like NRED. Wilmac covers nearly 39.7k acres in BC, roughly 6.2 miles from Hudbay's producing Copper Mountain mine. The company has identified 3 priority exploration areas, multiple interpreted porphyry centres, copper-in-soil values reaching 1,125 ppm, and an interpreted intrusive system roughly 11.2 miles across.

Copper is becoming part of trade negotiations, supply-chain security and defense policy at the same time North America is trying to reduce its exposure to concentrated overseas processing.

That makes promising Canadian copper ground a lot more interesting to me than it was a few years ago.

And $NRED happens to be sitting right in the middle of that theme.

u/Phil_Hogan_CPA_CA — 10 days ago

Yesterday's PR Finally Made The Exploration Plan Click For Me

I've read quite a few NRED technical releases over the last few months, but yesterday's was the first one where the entire strategy clicked.

Pretty much what is clear they find places where multiple independent datasets point to the same target. Surface intrusions, copper-in-soil values up to 1,125 ppm, magnetic anomalies, IP chargeability and AMT geophysics are all being layered together before a single drill hole is planned.

The company also explained why the Lamont area stands out. The historical 3DIP/AMT survey identified two interpreted parent intrusive bodies with multiple pipe-like features extending toward surface. That gives the exploration team something much more specific to test than simply drilling the largest magnetic anomaly they can find.

Project has evolved from "interesting geology" into a structured exploration program. And btw up 14% right now at open

u/ryanmiles1990 — 13 days ago

I Think People Are Missing Why The FIU Connection Actually Matters

When I first saw photos of Lee Caplin and EyeX CEO Valentin S aitarli visiting FIU's Robotics & Digital Fabrication Lab, I honestly thought it was just another networking stop.

Then I spent some time looking into FIU itself.

This isn't just a university with a robotics department. FIU is an R1 research university, putting roughly $326M into research every year and about $1.4B over a five-year period. In 2024 alone it was awarded 55 U.S. utility patents, and its robotics work spans autonomous systems, robotic fabrication, hazardous-environment inspection and computer vision. That's a pretty serious innovation ecosystem.

Then look at the people involved.

Lee Caplin isn't a typical junior mining advisor. He has more than 40 years in intellectual property, media, emerging technology and commercialization. He also donated $10M to establish the Lee Caplin School of Journalism & Media at FIU, so he's not walking into this ecosystem as an outsider. He already has deep relationships there and understands how to move ideas from research into real businesses.

Now add EyeX to the picture.

EyeX is building computer vision software that can turn existing mine cameras, drones, vehicle feeds and thermal systems into operational intelligence. MetalCore focuses on helping decide where to explore using AI-assisted geological analysis. EyeX focuses on understanding what is happening across the physical site in real time. Those are two different problems, but they're highly complementary, and both sit squarely inside the broader push toward digital mining.

That's why I don't think the FIU visit was simply about taking a few photos in a robotics lab.

If you're trying to build technology around mining, universities can provide access to researchers, graduate talent, prototype development, testing environments and commercialization opportunities. Having someone like Lee Caplin, whose career has largely been built around partnerships and intellectual property, makes that connection even more interesting.

This explains why management is spending time inside places like FIU instead of only attending mining conferences.

If NRED's long-term vision is bigger than finding copper, which it probably is, then building relationships inside one of Florida's strongest research ecosystems actually makes a lot of strategic sense. It's one of those details that's easy to dismiss as "just another meeting," but it could end up being more important than people realize if the company continues expanding its technology ambitions.

u/ryanmiles1990 — 15 days ago

It's amazing how one good comment can completely change your opinion

I love reading DD posts, but some of the best insights I've found weren't in the post itself.

They were buried somewhere in the comments.

Someone points out a risk.

Someone else shares industry experience.

Another person finds an old filing that changes the entire story.

It's a good reminder that investing works better when people challenge ideas instead of simply agreeing with them.

What's the best thing you've ever learned from a Reddit comment rather than the original post?

reddit.com
u/ryanmiles1990 — 30 days ago

what Canadian company do you think deserves more attention?

I've spent the last few days going through Canadian companies outside the usual large-cap names.

There are a lot of businesses that barely get mentioned but seem to be making steady progress.

I'm not looking for the biggest company or the safest investment.

Just something that's worth spending a few hours researching.

What's one Canadian stock you think deserves more attention than it's getting today?

reddit.com
u/ryanmiles1990 — 1 month ago

has your highest conviction Canadian stock changed over the past week?

About a week ago I asked which Canadian stock had the strongest setup for the next 12 months.

There were some great ideas across mining, energy, financials and tech.

Since then we've had more news, more volatility and plenty of market movement.

So I'm curious...

Has your highest conviction changed?

Or are you even more confident than you were a week ago?

If you had to build a Canadian portfolio today using just one stock as the foundation...

Which company would you choose now, and why?

reddit.com
u/ryanmiles1990 — 1 month ago

which Canadian stock has the strongest setup for the next 12 months?

Canadian markets have no shortage of interesting stories right now.

Gold.

Copper.

Critical minerals.

Energy.

AI.

Financials.

I'm trying to narrow my watchlist and would rather hear ideas from people who've actually done the research than scroll through endless headlines.

If you could only buy ONE Canadian stock today and hold it until next summer...

What would you choose?

More importantly, what's the catalyst that gives you the most confidence?

reddit.com
u/ryanmiles1990 — 1 month ago