



The exact same problem, blue button >50%, red button no die.
BUT, just before you vote, you are informed that if you team wins, the new world will be run by 50+ year old hardcore flat earther creationists youtuber podcasters, you can divert your hand to vote for the other button now, do you still go through with your original plan?
you know the drill, red nothing, blue if >50% everyone lives or else blue dies.
but after that we repeat the problem with all people alive, but this time, blue voters get ice cream while red doesnt.
then we repeat again but red has to kill all the blue players if blue loses
then we repeat the problem but red voters had to sacrifice a finger
then we repeat the problem but red has to eat a bowl of shit everyday for the rest of their lives
then we repeat the problem but blue gets 10k dollars cash for voting.
then we repeat the problem until you see that blue is the right choice and there is no dilemma and i bust your balls enough to give in and vote blue.
............ Please for the love of fuck, stop rephrasing the problem and at the same time saying that "it is the same problem", your ancestors allegedly ate from the fruit of knowledge, act like you got some of that knowledge.
You are given the same exactly problem as the original one. But since we have to assume that babies and the impaired also vote but their choice is basically randomized, it would be safe to assume that the problem is also posted in English correct? therefore everyone not speaking English also chooses random. If this isnt the case, and the problem is translated then there is no reason not to "translate" the problem in another way, so that EVERYONE can understand the problem.
congratulations, the original problem is now posted in a language spoken by the 0.0001 percent of the population, enjoy your button mashing.
was this a good moral dilemma ?
You have voted your button of choice, but now here come 2 jacked af men with guns and swords (you cannot win little bro, dont even try it) and they tie you up and get you to the second part of the dilemma.
Now that they know what you want to vote, they bring you to another room. There is a guy or girl there, the person is of the sexual orientation that does not much yours (if you are bi, imagine it is the most unatrractive person ever) and tell you that you have to sensually suck they toes for 5 minutes, or else your button choice changes to the other one.
Is your conviction strong enough ?
Some clarifications:
underaged individuals are excluded from the toe-sucking trial.
if you enjoy sucking toes, you are executed on the spot. you cannot hide it, these guys know everything about you. (damn these guys are serious!).
you are forced into double the torture's time if you have made a rephrasing of the problem that sucks.