APAP vs bilevel
I'm still trying to make APAP work for UARS 12 months after starting. I'm currently at 9-16cm and subjectively, the results are about the same as anytime I've had settings of 8-9 minimum to 14-15 max. My 95% pressure is around 9.75, but was in the 10s at one point (~6m ago, settings about 9-15, but I've had a lot of setting changes since then).
For context, i had a titration study 3m ago which only took me up to 8cm and said they resolved all RERAs, but I still had 30 spontaneous arousals. My sleep med provider reviewed raw data and confirmed these were actually RERAs which were just not long enough to count. He said they greatly decreased at the 8cm point hence my current 9-16cm. He also diagnosed me with idiopathic hypersomnia and prescribed modafinil, but I don't feel good on it and don't want a bandaid for this problem.
I do not feel rested and have poor energy, adhd-like symptoms, almost daily headaches, and bruxism. The first few days after I started APAP last year, however, I felt euphoric. The regressed to a more manageable "really good", then closer to where I started but definitely not as bad.
Do I keep going up as long as i can tolerate it? Besides aerophagia due to needing higher settings, can someone explain to me like i'm 5 as to why bilevel helps with UARS more than APAP?
I know there is lack of research on this, but are there any "credible" sources I could cite if I end up asking my provider about going to bilevel?