Thoughts about this?
Sooo I came across this post where a guy rejected a girl because of her past and the girl got enraged because of it. Now I'm guessing it's probably a troll post with a fabricated scenario for karma farming but still assuming it has happened in real life, was she right to get infuriated over this? I believe she was partially as no girl would entertain someone who'd subtly judge others for their past and body count but then again she reached out to him by herself and people can have preferences regardless of what is its origin. But at the same time, we know how red-pilled content and the whole manosphere and incel community have injected into the minds of the young, narratives that if a girl has past, she's impure and you shouldn't get into relationship with her and call her the r-word and she's for the streets blah blah. So the origin of the preference of wanting a partner without any past or body count seems to me a bit controversial. If you're an Andrew Tate fan who gets influenced by his misogynistic ideologies and then spew bs like "no seal no deal" in a more formal manner, that's still quite messed up for sure. I'm nuanced on this whole thing and couldn't say what is right or what is wrong. What are your views on this?