
u/the_mad_statter

Companies Hiring Temps Over Permanent Employees As They Wait To See What Happens With AI
cpapracticeadvisor.comA majority of net new money raised is going to fund AI now
This chart shows net money raised by companies, including debt and equity.
IG - Investment Grade (generally large companies)
VC - Venture Capital (startups)
HY - High Yield (generally smaller, riskier companies)
Most surprising to me is nearly 40% of high yield money is going to AI.
Google DeepMind CEO Thinks AI Job Cuts Are Dumb, AI Should Make Workers More Productive Not Replace Them
wired.comThe AI economy is rewriting the American Dream: Blue-collar workers are poised to win
cnbc.comCitadel CEO Ken Griffin "fairly depressed" now that AI is doing PhD-level finance work in hours instead of weeks
msn.comMicrosoft AI chief gives it 18 months—for all white-collar work to be automated by AI
fortune.comYour doctor’s AI notetaker may be making things up, Ontario audit finds
arstechnica.comQ1 2026 AI funding blows past 2025 total with three deals accounting for 67% of capital
finance.yahoo.comStudents question value of college as costs rise and AI reshapes jobs
pbs.orgAmazon employees are "tokenmaxxing" due to pressure to use AI tools
arstechnica.comGeorge Clooney, Tom Hanks, and Meryl Streep back new ‘Human Consent Standard’ for AI licensing
theverge.comSurvey: 73% of companies have reduced junior software developer roles
From this report. They did not share number of participants but companies were across 10 industries including:
35% - Tech
25% - Financial Services
8% - Health and Pharma
6% - Gov
6% - Non-profit
Directionally lines up with other data we've seen and discussed recently including from Indeed and Stanford.
92% of lawyers say they work the same amount or more since they started using AI
Why?
- Lawyers say they have an unlimited supply of work. There's always more to be done.
- AI causes more corrective work.
- Many still bill by the hour. Getting done faster doesn't pay.
Oracle uses loophole in WARN Act to classify laid off workers as remote
As if the Oracle layoff story wasn't bad enough, they avoided a WARN Act violation by classifying hybrid employees as remote.
Was reading this article about the Oracle layoff. Apparently the WARN Act requires 2 months notice when laying off 50 or more people from the same location.
"The WARN Act is a law that requires companies conducting mass layoffs to give employees two months notice prior to letting them go. It’s triggered when 50 or more people are impacted at one location. By classifying employees as remote workers, the minimum location requirements can be sidestepped.
Some people were unaware they were classified as remote workers, because they were near an office and worked on a hybrid schedule."
The workers also attempted to negotiate severance packages to be more in line with what other tech companies have done. Oracle declined to negotiate.
Was covered in the takeover tracker newsletter: https://aitakeovertracker.com/news