Mythos and observability: what happens after AI finds the vulnerability?
Hey folks, I work on the IBM Observability team and wanted to get your take on Project Glasswing and Claude Mythos Preview.
Mythos is being used by select partners, including IBM, to find and validate software vulnerabilities much faster than traditional workflows. IBM is also expanding tools like IBM Concert to unify application, infrastructure and network signals into a single operational view.
Curious how people think this should work in practice: if AI can surface more vulnerabilities faster, what should observability platforms show to help teams prioritize by business impact, reduce noise and move from detection to response?