





Which tribe do I resemble the most?
I finally got my FTDNA autosomal raw data converted and merged with the AADR 1240K dataset, then ran ADMIXTOOLS 2 / qpAdm models against ancient and modern proxy populations.
Basic workflow:
.fam population labels so ADMIXTOOLS could recognize the AADR groups.The early North African / Levantine / Punic models failed badly. They produced impossible weights like huge positive North African ancestry paired with huge negative Levantine or Roman ancestry, so I treated those as invalid.
The models became more sensible once I added northwest European proxies like English, CEU, and GBR, plus East African / Horn / Nile-related proxies like Kenya_Somali, Sudan_Kulubnarti, Tanzania_Swahili, and Kenya_PastoralN_Nderit.
The best broad signal was consistently:
Northwest European + East African / Nile-Horn / Swahili-Pastoral-like
The most useful feasible proxy models were roughly:
Important caveat: none of these were formally accepted qpAdm models. The p-values were still extremely low, so I’m treating them as exploratory proxy positions rather than final ancestry proportions.
My takeaway is that with the AADR references I had available, qpAdm could place the broad axis pretty clearly, but it could not find a clean formally accepted source model for a modern mixed individual. Better Ethiopian/Eritrean/Somali/Afar/Oromo/Tigray/Amhara references would probably improve the modeling a lot.