r/CAPR_Stock

Delayed start vs Early Start

Looking closely at data, for first year of treatment there is no separation at month 9, and at month 12 there is a sharp drop off in placebo for the first year. Because the four data points are not on the same scale and graph, it seems that Deramiocel is better than placebo for the first year of treatment at month 12. However, if you interpose the graph the story changes a bit and the error bars seem to cross. Maybe that is why the gap up was faded yesterday.

https://preview.redd.it/7pgiohn2avsh1.png?width=975&format=png&auto=webp&s=b92a063bc279c90fa8d63ca0cb21d2b6727d1d72

On the below graph both the delayed and early start are on the same scale and graph. However, looking at the early start lower error bar it is closer to -2 than -1 as shown in the previous early start chart. A bit frustrating. Which is it? The improvement in the delayed start group is visible at month 24, however the plotted line for early start in the above chart and the plotted line for early start in the below chart don't agree at month 12. Can someone shed some light on this?

https://preview.redd.it/smh2vm9tbvsh1.png?width=1627&format=png&auto=webp&s=8ce47aeaeef6a5d0bbc0b54ba6c4314b5a7e1f29

reddit.com
u/JGMR2026 — 14 days ago