r/CRISPR

▲ 17 r/CRISPR+1 crossposts

Human breeding(in the artificial wombs after collecting humans eggs and sperms) could be the dystopian ultimate last resort to revert the population bomb. Imagine babies grown in a farm like environment in masses just to save humanity in the future.

Imagine in the dystopian future where the natural birth rate is so low that as a last resort humanity starts harvesting(even buying) eggs and sperm, even cloning and mass breeding the babies in the artificial wombs. Those babies would be grown in a farm-like environment with no one to call parents and just exist to keep the world moving and fill the labour gap in the world economy. This might seem doom and gloom but every species would do anything and everything when it comes to survival according to Darwin's theory as well.

reddit.com
u/starman69420 — 5 days ago
▲ 223 r/CRISPR+2 crossposts

A major conceptual novelty and an infrastructure breakthrough for the field of generative biology

This is basically "vibe coding" for biology, that will massively help in smart medicine & cancer therapies. Also, by being a high-level programming language, is a huge deal for AI models as well.

(Proto’s architecture was designed to support autonomous agentic workflows. Before Proto, it was nearly impossible for an LLM or an AI agent to design complex biological systems autonomously because the step-by-step process required highly specific, manual environment configurations and specialized engineering skills.)

Proto treats biological design like high-level computer programming. Instead of picking static parts out of nature, you tell the computer the exact goals and rules you want your biological system to follow.

Proto connects different specialized AI models behind the scenes. One AI might predict how a protein folds, another predicts how DNA turns on, and a third generates completely new sequences. Proto coordinates all of them to design a custom, functional piece of DNA or protein from scratch that matches your goals, meaning scientists can test just a handful of highly accurate designs in a physical lab instead of thousands.

Learn more about this new breakthrough here:

u/ProxyLumina — 5 days ago
▲ 113 r/CRISPR+1 crossposts

First use of precision editing to study human embryo development reveals role of master gene: « Scientists have, for the first time, used an extremely precise genome editing technique called base editing to study gene function in human embryos. »

cam.ac.uk
u/fchung — 7 days ago
▲ 17 r/CRISPR

Creating the World’s First CRISPR Medicine, for Sickle Cell Disease

When Vijay Sankaran was an MD-PhD student at Harvard Medical School in the mid-2000s, one of his first clinical encounters was with a 24-year-old patient whose sickle cell disease left them with almost weekly pain episodes.

“The encounter made me wonder, couldn’t we do more for these patients?” said Sankaran, who is now the HMS Jan Ellen Paradise, MD Professor of Pediatrics at Boston Children’s Hospital.

Get more HMS news

As a budding hematologist, Sankaran knew all too well that people with sickle cell disease — marked by malformed, sickle-shaped red blood cells that can aggregate and block small vessels — experience excruciating pain crises, tissue and organ damage, and shortened life expectancy.

He also understood that the only treatment available at the time was hydroxyurea, which reduces sickling but isn’t effective in all patients and can cause side effects. The only chance at a cure was to undergo a bone marrow transplant, available to only a small percentage of patients because it carries significant risks and requires a well-matched donor.

Sankaran’s rotations through the hematology clinic made him want to change the story of the disease, both at the bedside as a soon-to-be physician and by joining the laboratory of HMS alumnus Stuart H. Orkin, the HMS David G. Nathan Distinguished Professor of Pediatrics at Boston Children’s and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.

In 2008, Orkin, Sankaran, and colleagues achieved their vision by identifying a new therapeutic target for sickle cell disease.

Promotion for Harvard Medicine magazine's newsletter, subscribe today

In December 2023, through the development efforts of CRISPR Therapeutics and Vertex Pharmaceuticals, their decades-long endeavor reached fruition in the form of a new treatment, CASGEVY, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.

The decision has ushered in a new era for sickle cell disease treatment — and marked the world’s first approval of a medicine based on CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technology.

foundation for the first gene-editing medicine

By the time Sankaran joined the federally supported Orkin Lab, Orkin had been illuminating the underlying mechanisms of red blood cell development and function and related hematological disorders for decades.

“Over the last 40 years, Stu has been a pioneer,” said HMS alumnus David Altshuler, executive vice president and chief scientific officer at Vertex and senior lecturer on genetics, part-time, at HMS, who oversaw the development of CASGEVY. “Through his work, we’ve come to understand how red blood cells work, how they develop in the body, and, particularly, how mutations lead to sickle cell disease.”

Sickle cell disease stems from a mutation in the gene that makes hemoglobin, the protein in red blood cells that carries oxygen throughout the body. Orkin’s team and others revealed that hemoglobin has two forms — fetal and adult — and that only the adult form is affected by sickle cell mutations, while the fetal form functions normally. However, shortly after birth, fetal hemoglobin production is turned off in the body, while adult hemoglobin production takes over.

Orkin had been investigating whether it was possible to switch fetal hemoglobin back on to treat sickle cell disease, but progress had stalled. Then, with help from Sankaran, patient samples from the National Institutes of Health, and a team in Sardinia, Italy, advances in genome-wide association studies revealed the gene that would hold the ticket: BCL11A.

Sankaran and Orkin showed that BCL11A suppresses production of fetal hemoglobin. Their landmark publication in Science kicked off a new era for sickle cell disease research.

Just three years later, in 2011, Orkin and others in his group showed that removing BCL11A from developing red blood cells in a mouse model of sickle cell disease turned on fetal hemoglobin production and cured the mice. This laid the foundation for clinical trials.

In 2013, another hematology fellow who joined the Orkin laboratory, Daniel Bauer — now the HMS Donald S. Fredrickson, MD Associate Professor of Pediatrics at Boston Children’s — identified a DNA sequence in BCL11A that, when removed, drastically reduced the gene’s activity.

Then CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing technology swept onto the scene, and Bauer, Orkin, and colleagues identified a single DNA cut that could impair BCL11A activity.

But a steep climb remained to transform this discovery into a safe and effective gene therapy for patients. Appreciating both the difficulty and the importance of such work, the researchers and their home institutions made the intellectual property available to companies through nonexclusive licensing.

Bringing the first genetic medicines to patients

Altshuler decided in 2015 to leave academia after 25 years, including 15 years as HMS professor of genetics and of medicine, to join Vertex full-time. He was motivated to contribute to the paradigm shift happening in genetic medicine — particularly the translation of biological insights into therapies for patients.

“My mind moved on from discovery to ‘how are we going to make therapies?’” he explained. “We were looking for new programs where we could make a transformative medicine for people with a serious disease.”

Altshuler had followed the work of the Orkin Lab for many years, and he had taught Sankaran in the classroom. On day one at Vertex, he knew that he wanted to work on BCL11A.

We were looking for new programs where we could make a transformative medicine for people with a serious disease.

David Altshuler

Vertex executive vice president and chief scientific officer; HMS senior lecturer on genetics, part-time

Over the next nine years, Altshuler oversaw further research and development of the experimental therapy through a plethora of preclinical and clinical studies led by CRISPR Therapeutics and Vertex.

In clinical trials, the therapy eliminated small-vessel blockages, known as vaso-occlusive or sickle cell crises, for virtually all patients.

Today, CASGEVY is approved for use in patients with sickle cell disease in the United States and multiple countries in Europe and the Middle East.

“It’s an amazing gift to have been able to play a role in such a thing,” said Altshuler.

The tale continues

Vertex is working to secure approvals in additional countries, and it takes time after such approvals for treatments to actually become available to patients. Altshuler estimates it will take another 5 to 10 years to provide maximum access.

Plus, researchers including Orkin, Sankaran, and those at Vertex continue to conduct research to make sickle cell treatment more effective, more efficient, and appropriate for even more patients. Right now, only a subset of patients qualify for CASGEVY, mainly because it requires a bone marrow transplant and access to well-resourced health care facilities. Access is also limited by treatment cost. The current treatment also does not reverse permanent damage previously wrought on the body by the disease.

“It’s the beginning of a long journey,” said Altshuler. “We will keep working to make better therapies until we can help all patients with this disease around the world.”

For his part, Sankaran has been thrilled to see a new option for patients and to be part of what he hopes is a growing trend of academia-industry partnerships that shorten the time and raise the success rates of bringing lab discoveries to the clinic.

“I’m excited about what’s ahead, because as somebody who spends their time largely in the laboratory, I see things happening — fundamental discoveries — that hopefully will also start to impact the kind of therapies that industry can test in patients,” he said.

hms.harvard.edu
u/Salute-Major-Echidna — 5 days ago
▲ 2 r/CRISPR+1 crossposts

Built a free tool that goes sequence → scored gRNAs → 3D structure in ~5s, looking for feedback.

Quick context: I've spent the last while building CRISPRR with a research collaborator, aimed at cutting down the time between "I have a target gene" and "I have a guide I'm confident enough to order."

What it does: you paste in a sequence, and you get back gRNAs ranked by CRISPRon efficiency scoring, off-target risk across the genome, and a 3D model of the Cas9-gRNA complex so you can actually look at the structure before committing to a guide. All in about 5 seconds.

The motivation was pretty simple — designing guides well usually means juggling 3-4 tools and a lot of manual cross-referencing, and that's before you've touched a pipette.

What I'd love feedback on from people actually running CRISPR experiments:

- Does seeing the 3D structure actually change how you'd pick between two similarly-scored guides, or is it more of a nice-to-have?

- What's missing that would make this part of your actual workflow rather than just a curiosity?

- Any horror stories about a guide that scored well computationally but failed at the bench? Curious what scoring tends to miss.

It's free, no account needed: crisprr.bio. Would rather hear what's wrong with it than just feedback that's nice to hear. Link in the comments

u/_pranayjoshi_ — 7 days ago
▲ 0 r/CRISPR+1 crossposts

Shoot your gene sequence -> I'll design your guides and 3D structure for free!

Hey everyone! I recently built Crisprr, an AI platform that takes a gene sequence and generates optimized gRNAs, predicts guide performance, creates 3D structures, and exports experiment-ready results in seconds.

I'm looking for interesting sequences to test and improve the platform.

Drop a gene name or DNA sequence in the comments, and I'll run it through Crisprr and share the results here. I'd also love feedback on the outputs and what features would actually be useful in your research workflow.

reddit.com
u/_pranayjoshi_ — 6 days ago
▲ 6 r/CRISPR+3 crossposts

[Academic] The ethics of human gene editing/ CRISPR (takes 2-3 minutes)

I am currently collecting primary data for my A-Level research project looking into public perceptions of human gene editing (specifically technologies like CRISPR).

Whether you are a biology student or have never heard of gene editing before, your perspective is incredibly valuable to help me understand how baseline knowledge affects ethical views!

  • Time to complete: 2 to 3 minutes max.
  • Format: Multiple choice & linear scales (with one optional text box at the end).
  • Anonymity: Completely anonymous. No emails or names are collected.

Click here to take survey

If you have a survey of your own that needs filling out, please leave a comment below with your link after completing mine, and I will gladly return the favor!

Thank you so much for helping a student out!

 

 

u/Street_Papaya4842 — 7 days ago
▲ 5 r/CRISPR+3 crossposts

This is kind of creepy 😭 can someone watch and tell me if this really happens?

I just found this thing and it's highkey freaky deaky

youtube.com
u/PhantomSlayz581 — 10 days ago