r/CanonR10

Tamron rf-s 17-70mm f/2.8 Di III-A VC RXD vs canon rf-s 18-150mm f3.5-6.3 IS STM

I have an r10 with the 18-45mm kit lens. I only got it because there was a great combo deal on the body and kit lens together. I am looking for something that can work in close-up, low light, indoor situations, as well as outdoors for portraits and wildlife. I'm just a hobbyist.

I'm considering the tamron rf-s 17-70mm as my general purpose lens, but I see there are refurbished Canon rf-s 18-150mm lenses available for about half the cost of the Tamron. I can't afford to spend more than $1000 total, so going for better Canon RF glass is out of the question. I am thinking of also getting a wide angle zoom or prime lens to go with this and at some point the rf 35mm/1.8 and the 50mm/1.8 stm. I also have an older sigma EF 105mm f2.8 macro lens that works ok on the r10. It's not the greatest lens, but it fills in some gaps for me.

What do you recommend I get?

reddit.com
u/Maximum_Film_5694 — 5 days ago
▲ 6 r/CanonR10+2 crossposts

Any recommendations for prints ?

Hi all just took a shot in the dark and had some of my photos printed at Walgreens (probably not the smartest idea) and I’m not completely happy with them. Half of them are blown out and the other ones are off center. Can anyone recommend a website for prints? Attached are some things I want to try printing

u/philly100s — 8 days ago
▲ 2 r/CanonR10+1 crossposts

Canon R10 / ISO Problems

Hello guys,

I have a problem with my Canon R10, since I take photos in futsal I need to use a moderately high ISO, my problem is that with my equipment when I raise more than 600 ISO the photos already look very bad, for this reason I must take them in raw and then pass them through the lightroom noise eliminator, but that process takes a long time.

My question is if the R10 really doesn't support that much ISO or is there something wrong?.

reddit.com
u/Legitimate-Hunt5112 — 10 days ago