r/CivilRights

so I’ve been dealing with discrimination quite often I used to be a member of the YMCA and I always got along with people. I do have Asperger syndrome. Which is part of the spectrum. I look masculine for a female. I do have a different look than what my gender actually is. This is something medical that I cannot control. When I go to public places like I stated above the YMCA.

They started off by telling me I had a two hour limit. It’s called YMCA rivers Crossing. During the fact of them saying I had a two hour limit everybody else was allowed to be there longer than two hours. It’s almost like they set a certain standard for me, but not for anyone else.

i’ve noticed this happened. Before. I had an individual who has stated they had a friend that dealt with the same thing and they were transgender. This was something that they dealt with when they were using the female locker room before the universal one was in place.

The reason I bring this up is because all this started when I started using the female restroom to go to the bathroom. 🚽 and the universal to take a shower. They decided to ban me because I did state that I had the intent to sue but for the right reasons as they allowed other people to stay almost a whole day and never gave them flack, but they gave me.

I have supporting documentation for that with the YMCA. I would also like to touch on the fact that I keep to myself because I don’t seem to get along with a lot of people anyway because of my condition. to add more to the problem, I went to retro fitness the retro fitness I was at I worked out like I normally do after taking a shower. Didn’t seem to have an issue, but I’m on my phone trying to pay my phone bill just doing a couple quick things sitting down for a minute because there is a sitting area in the locker room. The manager stated to me that I wasn’t allowed to use my phone in the locker room.

OK I was like sorry about that and was OK with that thinking it was a normal situation. I see this other girl come in the locker room and start taking photos of herself in the mirror so I made sure I mentioned to the lady that there needs to be a standard across-the-board. Why is she taking photos of herself in there if I can’t be using my phone to pay a bill? then she tells me that the Jim owner instructed her to basically harass me for using my phone. I think this has to do with my androgyny as a female looking like a man. I need to know what I can do to find the right legal help so I can start taking action against these business businesses please help.

Trump’s War on Legal Immigration Is a War on American Growth

The administration is turning visas, green cards, and lawful entry into weapons of political theater.

By Van Abbott

Donald Trump is no longer simply sealing a border; he is slowly strangling the economic bloodstream that helped make the United States the most dynamic nation on earth.

The latest reporting reveals a strategy that reaches far beyond illegal immigration. Visa delays stretch longer. Vetting expands wider. Travel restrictions multiply. Green card approvals slow to a crawl. The administration keeps tightening lawful immigration until the process itself becomes punishment. People who followed the rules, paid the fees, filed the forms, and waited patiently now find themselves trapped in a bureaucratic maze where the walls keep moving.

This is not border enforcement. It is administrative suffocation.

Trump wants Americans to see strength. What they are actually witnessing is a government confusing obstruction with order and cruelty with competence. The uncertainty is deliberate. The exhaustion is deliberate. A system once designed to attract talent and reward ambition is being recast as a gauntlet of suspicion, delay, intimidation, and attrition.

America does not run on slogans shouted at rallies. It runs on workers, scientists, engineers, entrepreneurs, investors, researchers, risk-takers. It runs on confidence in the future. When visas stall, businesses postpone hiring. When green cards freeze, families delay decisions. When legal immigration contracts, the economy contracts with it. Analysts now warn that lawful immigration could fall sharply over the next four years, stripping the country of labor, innovation, tax revenue, consumer demand, and entrepreneurial energy all at once.

Fewer workers. Fewer patents. Fewer paychecks.

Trump claims he is putting America first, yet his policies increasingly place America behind in the global competition for talent. Brilliant students who once dreamed of Silicon Valley now look toward Toronto, Berlin, Singapore, London. Skilled physicians reconsider where to practice. Researchers reconsider where to build laboratories. Entrepreneurs reconsider where to launch companies. Talent is mobile, capital is mobile, opportunity is mobile, and fear travels fast.

The damage reaches beyond economics because legal immigration has always been one of America’s greatest strategic advantages. The nation grew powerful not by sealing itself off from ambition, but by attracting ambition from every corner of the world. Again and again, immigrants arrived with little more than skill, hunger, discipline, and determination, then built businesses, advanced science, strengthened universities, expanded industries, and revitalized communities.

Now the country sends a different message: You are welcome only until politics changes.

Republicans once praised free markets, economic growth, and entrepreneurial dynamism. Now they construct bureaucratic choke points that suppress the very forces that fuel prosperity. They praise capitalism while undermining labor supply. They celebrate innovation while driving innovators elsewhere. They proclaim strength while governing through resentment and fear.

Not because immigrants weakened America. Not because the economy can afford contraction. Not because the system demanded demolition.

But because grievance has become the party’s governing fuel.

For immigrant families already here legally, the emotional toll is immediate. A husband worries a delay could separate him from his wife. A student fears a paperwork error could erase years of sacrifice. Parents open government notices with dread instead of trust. Children absorb the anxiety hanging over kitchen tables and learn early that stability can disappear with a bureaucratic stamp.

Policy may be drafted in Washington, but fear settles into ordinary homes.

Meanwhile, Trump asks Americans to absorb crisis after crisis abroad and at home. International tensions deepen. Legal battles intensify. Institutions strain under constant political assault. Every week unleashes another spectacle designed to dominate headlines and drown accountability beneath outrage. Trump understands that fury commands attention and chaos consumes oxygen.

But oxygen is not leadership, and outrage is not governance.

His immigration strategy increasingly resembles a nation padlocking its front door while its economic foundation quietly cracks beneath the floorboards.

Trump’s defenders argue that sovereignty demands toughness. Every nation has the right to secure its borders and enforce its laws. True enough. But sovereignty is not self-destruction. A serious government protects national strength. It does not weaken its labor force, repel talent, destabilize families, and inject uncertainty into the economy simply to stage a performance of political machismo.

This is the deeper danger of Trump’s legal immigration crackdown. It teaches Americans to mistake damage for dominance and conflict for competence. Donald Trump began by waging war on legal immigration, but if this campaign continues, the ultimate casualty may be the American growth, confidence, and dynamism that lawful immigration helped build for generations.

CHECK out my new website: politicalwinds.org

The arc of the universe doesn't bend towards justice - it bends because ordinary people have forced it into a more just shape.

Because here’s the thing about the bending of that moral arc: the universe has jack squat to do with it. It bends because calloused hands have forced it into a more just shape.

The eight hour work day, women’s suffrage, the dismantling of Jim Crow: these imperfect but real gains didn’t just ‘happen’. Every one of them was wrestled from a system that was set up to monopolize power, wealth, and dignity for a select few.

When ‘We The People’ was penned, it was understood at the time that ‘The People’ didn’t actually include everyone, coming as it did in an epoch where humanity itself was a graded category.

The selective equality being championed by the Founders rested upon a taken-for-granted dominator hierarchy with white male property owners at the summit, and everyone else bearing the weight below.

What most of the signatories to this compact didn’t anticipate is that those who were systematically excluded from the benefits of this arrangement might use its lofty ideals as a crowbar to pry open doors that were never meant for them.

For as long as there has been an America, there have been people who’ve refused to make peace with this vast chasm between stated ideals and reality.

That long struggle - and what it produced - deserves to be celebrated.