r/CreatorsAI

Volume > Perfection (took me 3 months to figure this out)

ngl, first 3 months were rough. i was posting maybe one or two reels a week and watching them flatline. each one took me hours. writing, recording, editing, captions. kept thinking the next one would finally hit.

It didn't.

Around week 12 i actually looked back at everything and the pattern was painfully obvious. the ones that did okay? not the ones I poured hours into.they were the ones where i just shipped something and moved on.

So i flipped it. stopped obsessing over perfect edits. started treating each post like a test batch instead of a final exam. goal became can i get a rough idea out today rather than next week.

Thats when i started looking at ai shorts generator workflows because i needed something that could keep up with the volume.

also realized I was jumping between like four or five tools for scripts, visuals, voiceover, editing and the switching cost alone was killing me. moved to framia cause i could just describe what i wanted and let the agent handle generation and iteration in one place instead of exporting and importing across apps all day. the output isn't perfect. but im posting 4-5x more often now and two of those actually picked up real traction this week.

Still reminding myself everyday this is a marathon. more posts = more swings at the bat.perfection gives you one shot every two weeks.

reddit.com
u/Prestigious_Ice6573 — 4 days ago

Demis Hassabis quit his CEO job because he thinks AGI is too close to waste time on quarterly reports

Demis Hassabis spent 30 years building toward AGI.

Last week he decided running the company doing it was no longer the best use of his time.

Let that land. This isn't a burnt-out exec taking a sabbatical. This is the person who built AlphaFold, who cracked protein folding after 50 years of failure, who has more credibility on AGI timelines than almost anyone alive. And he looked at where things are heading and decided: the CEO chair is the wrong seat for what's coming next.

He's not stepping back. He's repositioning. His new focus is building the infrastructure for superintelligent systems to do actual lab work. Not managing the company that builds AI. Preparing for what the AI does once it's smarter than the people managing it.

He expects AGI by 2030. Give or take a year.

He expects half a dozen to a dozen more AlphaFold-level breakthroughs in medicine over the next two decades. Not incremental drug approvals. Not better diagnostics. AlphaFold-level. Each one rewriting a field.

He expects all diseases to be cured within 20 years.

"I wouldn't say I'm certain, but I'm very confident."

That's not hype. Hassabis doesn't do hype. That's a man who has been right about hard things before, saying out loud that he sees the finish line.

Here's what makes this different from every other AGI prediction you've scrolled past. Hassabis didn't tweet it. He didn't say it on a podcast to sell something. He quit one of the most powerful seats in AI to go act on it. Revealed preferences beat stated ones every time. When someone with his track record reorganizes their entire life around a belief, that's a different category of signal than a prediction.

The uncomfortable part is what it implies for everything built around the current timeline. Cancer research funding cycles. Drug approval infrastructure. The entire 15-year pipeline from molecule to market. All of it designed for a world where breakthroughs take decades and cost billions. If Hassabis is even half right, that world has maybe one pipeline cycle left before the economics stop making sense.

And if he's wrong, the most credible person in AI just resigned from DeepMind based on a prediction that won't survive the decade.

Either way, this is not a normal resignation.

reddit.com
u/ToothWeak3624 — 5 days ago

As a video editor, I thought AI would replace me. It just made me faster.

Been editing video for like 8 years. when AI tools started showing up I was legit scared. Thought that was it for me.
Tried a few. They were mostly trash tbh. Just weird uncanny valley stuff. then someone showed me this thing called Framia. You just describe your project,product, audience, vibe, length and it spits out a script, storyboard, visuals, voiceover, and music. Like a full rough cut in 30 minutes.
And I gotta say... it's not great. The pacing is weird. Music choices are questionable. Some shots look off.
But here's the thing,that rough cut used to take me like 4-5 hours just to get started. Now I only spend those hours on the actual editing. The rhythm. The emotional beats. The tiny details that make something good actually great.
AI does the boring part. I do the fun part. honestly my job got more interesting, not less.

reddit.com
u/dependent_berozgar — 6 days ago

AI might be getting a little too good at replacing basic human interaction 💀

Sam: “Here’s how ChatGPT can become part of your family’s daily life.”

Alex: “What if you just talked to your children”

Honestly, I don't think I've ever seen an AI reply win this hard. 😭

Who actually won this exchange?

u/CardStrange3023 — 5 days ago

LinkedOut might actually be the app nobody wants their boss to download 💀

LinkedIn: “I’m excited to announce my new opportunity.”

LinkedOut: “I quit because my manager made me hate Mondays.” 💀

Anonymous exit interviews would be absolutely unhinged.

What would your brutally honest resignation post say?

u/CardStrange3023 — 8 days ago

I just want to create. Why do i need to be a tool expert first?

New AI tool dropped yesterday. Looks promising. Should i switch? What about last week's? Still good?

I spend more time on reddit comparing tools than actually making stuff. Like image tool, video tool or music tool. Each has 5 alternatives and each has 10 youtube deep dives. By the time i pick one, my creative energy is gone.

I just want to make a video. Why do i need to be a tool expert first?

I switched to framia a while back. Tbh not because it's the best just because I don't have to choose anymore. One tool. One work flow. It has all the gen stuff in one canvas. Done!

Perfect? Nope lol. But at least i'm making things again instead of just reading about tools.

Anyone else stuck in analysis paralysis?

reddit.com
u/fluttershy7778 — 8 days ago

I avoided AI tools because I was scared but I was wrong.

gonna be honest,I refused to use AI for creative work. Just felt like cheating. Like it was coming for my job.

Then a client project came in with a crazy tight deadline. Two weeks of work, five days to deliver. I was desperate.

So I caved and tried Framia. Went in expecting to hate it.Turns out, it handled all the boring stuff ,rough script, storyboard, basic visuals,and I focused on the actual creative decisions. Tone, pacing, brand voice. All me.

Finished in half the time and so happy the client loved it.

Ya actually AI didn't replace me. Just made me faster. Kinda wish I'd tried it sooner tbh. anyone else go through this “AI denial” phase?

reddit.com
u/Asleep-Pilot-4142 — 10 days ago

I tried every AI headshot app. They all failed. Then I reverse-engineered a TIME cover photographer's style with one prompt.

Go try it out:

For Men:

Goal: Transform the attached photo into a professional black-and-white studio headshot in the style of a Marco Grob editorial monochrome portrait, the TIME magazine cover aesthetic: simple, psychologically intense, character-first.

Subject & identity: The man in the reference image. Keep his exact facial features, facial structure, skin tone, eye color, hair, and hairline completely unchanged — same age, same build, instantly recognizable to people who know him. Change only the framing, lighting, background, wardrobe, and tonal grade.

Composition & camera: Classic head-and-shoulders crop, chest-up, his eyes in the upper third of the frame, centered composition with a small margin above his head. Body squared to camera or turned 10-20 degrees, shoulders relaxed and level, head straight into the lens, chin neutral. Hasselblad medium-format look: short-telephoto perspective (about 100mm equivalent), no wide-angle distortion, extremely shallow but controlled depth of field — both eyes critically sharp, background fully defocused, smooth medium-format tonal transitions.

Lighting: Single large 5-foot softbox slightly above his eye level and 30-45 degrees to one side — soft but clearly directional, sculpting a gentle Rembrandt-style shadow on the far cheek with a gradual edge. One soft rectangular catchlight in the upper half of each eye. Subtle silver-reflector fill from the opposite side: shadows keep detail with a faint specular crispness, never flat. Ambient reads slightly underexposed so he pops from the frame (lit but not over-lit). Only a slight whisper of edge separation from the backdrop.

Background: Seamless studio gray, graduating from mid-gray behind his head to near-black at the frame edges with a natural falloff vignette. Smooth and empty, no props, texture, or scene.

Expression & mood: Direct, unwavering eye contact: alert, present eyes carry the portrait. Composed and quietly intense, mouth relaxed and closed, subtly smiling at the corners. Gravitas and self-possession; keep his natural optimistic micro-expression rather than a generic pleasant mask.

Wardrobe: A dark, well-fitted crew-neck sweater, wool texture in charcoal, black, or deep navy that reads as distinct dark tones in monochrome. No patterns, logos, tie, or crisp corporate suit.

Style & grade: Photorealistic editorial photograph in high-contrast neutral black and white: deep clean blacks, rich midtone separation across his face, controlled bright highlights, texture held in both shadows and highlights. Skin mapped to luminous, finely graded grays with visible pores, expression lines, and stubble... character over polish, minimal retouching only (stray hairs, temporary blemishes). Pure monochrome: no sepia, split-toning, or faded matte look.

Constraints: Do not alter his identity, age, or facial proportions. No beauty-filter smoothing or plastic skin, no reshaped features, no whitened teeth, no symmetry correction. No text, logos, or watermarks. Avoid AI-portrait tells: waxy skin, dead eyes, fused hair strands, over-sharpened halos.

Output: High-resolution vertical black-and-white portrait, 4:5 crop.

Women:

Goal: Transform the attached photo into a professional black-and-white studio headshot of a woman, in the style of Marco Grob's editorial monochrome portraits of women for TIME magazine covers: simple, elegant, psychologically present, character-first.

Subject & identity: The woman in the reference image — she must read unmistakably as a woman in the final image. Keep her exact facial features, feminine facial structure, skin tone, eye color, hairstyle, hair length, and hairline completely unchanged — same age, same build, instantly recognizable to people who know her. Keep her makeup exactly as it appears in the reference photo; do not add or remove any. Change only the framing, lighting, background, wardrobe, and tonal grade.

Composition & camera: Classic head-and-shoulders crop, chest-up, her eyes in the upper third of the frame, centered composition with a small margin above her head. Body squared to camera or turned 10-20 degrees, shoulders relaxed and level, head straight into the lens, chin neutral. Hasselblad medium-format look: short-telephoto perspective (about 100mm equivalent), no wide-angle distortion, shallow but controlled depth of field — both eyes critically sharp, background fully defocused, smooth medium-format tonal transitions.

Lighting: Single large 5-foot softbox slightly above her eye level and 30-45 degrees to one side — soft, flattering, clearly directional, with a gentle, open shadow on the far cheek that keeps her face luminous; never heavy, hard-edged, or angular. One soft rectangular catchlight in the upper half of each eye. Subtle silver-reflector fill from the opposite side: shadows keep detail with a faint specular crispness, never flat. Ambient reads slightly underexposed so she pops from the frame (lit but not over-lit). Only a slight whisper of edge separation from the backdrop.

Background: Seamless studio gray, graduating from mid-gray behind her head to near-black at the frame edges with a natural falloff vignette. Smooth and empty, no props, texture, or scene.

Expression & mood: Direct, unwavering eye contact: alert, present eyes carry the portrait. Composed and self-assured, mouth relaxed and closed but smiling. Poise, warmth, and quiet confidence; keep her natural micro-expression rather than a generic pleasant mask.

Wardrobe: An elegant, dark, well-fitted top with a feminine cut. Soft wool texture in charcoal, black, or deep navy that reads as distinct dark tones in monochrome. No patterns or logos.

Style & grade: Photorealistic editorial photograph in high-contrast neutral black and white: deep clean blacks, rich midtone separation across her face, controlled bright highlights, texture held in both shadows and highlights. Her skin mapped to luminous, finely graded grays with natural texture preserved — character over polish, minimal retouching only (stray hairs, temporary blemishes). Pure monochrome: no sepia, split-toning, or faded matte look.

Constraints: Do not alter her identity, age, or facial proportions, and do not masculinize her in any way: no squared or broadened jaw, no heavier brow, no thickened neck, no shortened hair, no stubble or shadow that reads as facial hair. No beauty-filter smoothing or plastic skin, no reshaped features, no whitened teeth, no symmetry correction. No text, logos, or watermarks. Avoid AI-portrait tells: waxy skin, dead eyes, fused hair strands, over-sharpened halos.

Output: High-resolution vertical black-and-white portrait of the woman in the reference image, 4:5 crop.
u/CardStrange3023 — 13 days ago

If I can make a decent ad with AI, literally anyone can!

I know absolutely nothing about video editing. like, I opened Premiere Pro once, stared at the timeline for 20 minutes, closed it, and never looked back.capCut is about my speed and even that takes me forever.

I needed a quick ad for a side project I'm launching next week,nothing fancy, just a 30-second explainer for social media. a friend who knows I'm really hopeless with video told me to try Framia because apparently all you do is “just type”. I was like, yeah right, nothing is that easy.

typed in a rough description of my product and the vibe I wanted. It spat out a full storyboard, script, voiceover, music, and the actual video clips all in one go. I honestly didn't believe it at first.

The first output was... Ya usable, but far from perfect. the voiceover sounded like a robot from 2010 and the pacing was all over the place – too fast in some parts, dragging in others. I tweaked the prompt a few times, changed the voice style, shortened the script, and after maybe 4 or 5 iterations, I got something actually decent.

for someone with zero editing skills, this thing is actually a lifesaver. It turned what would have been a multi-day nightmare into an afternoon project. Anyway don't expect magic,you still have to guide it, refine it, and accept that it's not going to be Hollywood-grade. If you're willing to iterate and babysit a bit, it's amazing. If you want one-click perfection right out of the box, you'll probably be disappointed.

I'm still not sure I'd use it for serious client work without heavy manual polish, but for social ads and quick turnarounds? Honestly, it got the job done. So happy to share the final video if anyone's curious.

reddit.com
u/No-Top9040 — 14 days ago