r/EarlyAmericanHistory

The Declaration of Independence ruined some of the men who signed it
▲ 470 r/EarlyAmericanHistory+4 crossposts

The Declaration of Independence ruined some of the men who signed it

I think one of the things history classes accidentally do is make the Founding Fathers feel untouchable.

Like they were all confident, powerful men standing in a room knowing they were about to create the United States.

But a lot of them genuinely had no idea if they were signing their own death warrants.

I went down a rabbit hole recently while working on a Virtual Wayback project about three signers of the Declaration: Benjamin Rush, Abraham Clark, and Lewis Morris.

And honestly, the personal cost surprised me.

Rush was one of the best-known doctors in the colonies. Supporting independence was not some safe career move for him. He risked destroying his reputation and medical practice by publicly backing what Britain considered open rebellion. Later in life he became obsessed with trying to repair the hatred and division between former founders because the Revolution and the politics afterward completely shattered a lot of friendships.

Lewis Morris was rich. He had status, land, privilege, everything people usually try to protect during unstable times. The British occupied and damaged his estate during the war because of his support for independence. He basically chose revolution knowing full well he had more to lose than most people.

But Abraham Clark’s story was the one I couldn’t stop thinking about.

Clark wasn’t one of the elite famous founders people usually talk about. He was known as “the poor man’s signer” because he pushed for ordinary farmers and common people politically. During the Revolution, two of his sons were captured by the British and imprisoned aboard the Jersey prison ship.

Those prison ships were horrific. Disease, starvation, abuse, overcrowding. Thousands died on them.

From what I’ve read, the British basically hinted that his sons could receive better treatment if Clark backed away from the revolutionary cause.

He refused.

I genuinely don’t know what I would’ve done in that situation.

That’s the side of the Revolution I think gets lost sometimes. These weren’t symbols yet. They were people making decisions while terrified, angry, uncertain, and risking things that were deeply personal.

We ended up making a new Virtual Wayback video/conversation about these three signers and what they sacrificed after signing the Declaration.

VIDEO: https://youtube.com/shorts/-03nB6e_SkQ

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/17nhFhoEU8/

https://www.tiktok.com/@virtualwayback/video/7641997557614267655

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYkMuyTpGT3/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA==

BLOG: https://virtualwayback.com/blog/price-of-a-signature

You can also talk with them yourself here: Virtual Wayback

Would you still sign the Declaration if you knew it could destroy your family, career, property, and future?

▲ 28 r/EarlyAmericanHistory+2 crossposts

How America accidentally became the most powerful country in history

For the first 100 years after Europeans reached the New World, nobody wanted North America. Spain took the gold and silver of Mexico and Peru. Portugal took Brazil. The French and Dutch chased furs. North America was considered cold, empty and useless. The land that would become the United States was basically the leftover nobody fought hard for.

What happened next was not destiny. It was a chain of accidents, gambles and lucky breaks.

Columbus was looking for Asia and bumped into the wrong continent. The 13 colonies were a mismatched group of religious refugees, debtors and merchants who spent most of their early history arguing with each other. Independence itself was a long shot, won partly because France wanted to embarrass Britain.

Then came the breaks. Napoleon needed cash for his European wars and sold Louisiana for about 3 cents an acre, doubling the country overnight. Settlers stumbled onto gold in California right after the US took it from Mexico. Russia sold Alaska for almost nothing and it turned out to be packed with gold and oil. The Civil War nearly destroyed the whole experiment, but the Union survived and came out industrialized.

By the time the canals were built, the railroads connected the coasts and two World Wars wrecked every rival, America was the last big economy standing. A country nobody believed in ended up running the world.

u/Away-Excitement-5997 — 3 days ago

May 11, 1776: Franklin Leaves Canada as the Revolution in the North Begins to Collapse

The American Revolution’s bold gamble to bring Canada into the rebellion was unraveling by May 11, 1776, and on this day one of the Revolution’s most famous figures quietly turned south toward home. Benjamin Franklin departed Montreal for Philadelphia, ending his difficult and disappointing mission to Canada alongside the American commissioners sent by Congress to hold together a collapsing northern campaign.

Franklin’s departure carried enormous symbolic weight. Only months earlier, many Patriot leaders had believed Canada might join the Revolution as a “fourteenth colony.” Congress had imagined French-speaking Canadians embracing the American cause once freed from British rule.

Instead, by the spring of 1776, the invasion of Canada was failing under the combined pressure of disease, hunger, expiring enlistments, poor discipline, weak logistics, and the arrival of British reinforcements. The retreat from Québec had shattered American momentum, and the commissioners now found themselves trying to rescue an army and a political mission that were both close to breaking apart.

At 70 years old, Franklin had pushed himself through the grueling winter journey north despite already fragile health. The road to Canada was harsh even for younger men. Snow, freezing temperatures, rough river travel, and primitive conditions battered the elderly statesman.

By the time he reached Montreal in late April, he encountered a military and political disaster already unfolding. Smallpox ravaged the Continental Army. Soldiers lacked food, clothing, powder, and pay. Local Canadian support for the rebellion was uncertain and fading. British authority, though shaken, was recovering.

Charles Carroll of Carrollton later recorded that Franklin’s health and the hopeless condition of affairs in Canada convinced him to return to Philadelphia. Charles Carroll of Carrollton and Samuel Chase remained in Montreal to continue the mission, but few illusions remained about success.

The commission itself had been extraordinary. Congress had sent Franklin north together with Charles Carroll, Samuel Chase, and the Catholic priest John Carroll in hopes of persuading French Canadians and the Catholic clergy to support the Revolution.

John Carroll’s inclusion was especially significant. Anti-Catholic prejudice had long existed in the British colonies, but Congress understood that winning Canadian support required showing respect toward the Catholic Church and French Canadian culture. The mission represented one of the earliest examples of the Revolution attempting to build political alliances through diplomacy rather than force alone.

But events on the ground overwhelmed persuasion. The American siege of Québec had collapsed only days earlier after British warships and reinforcements arrived in the St. Lawrence River. American forces, weakened by smallpox and starvation, abandoned their positions and retreated upriver in disorder. The dream of conquering Canada and denying Britain its northern base was rapidly disappearing.

The crisis was laid bare in a desperate letter Samuel Chase and Charles Carroll sent from Montreal on May 11 to Philip Schuyler. Their words revealed an army facing logistical ruin.

Pork supplies had nearly vanished. Reinforcements were arriving with only a few days of provisions. Transportation along the rivers was threatened. If British frigates forced their way through the Richelieu corridor, the Americans feared they could lose both their supply line and their route of retreat.

Their stark warning stripped away every remaining illusion about the campaign’s condition:

“Without provisions our soldiers must perish or feed on each other.”

It was not rhetorical flourish. Armies in the 18th century survived or died based on supply. Disease and hunger routinely killed more soldiers than battle itself, and in Canada the Continental Army faced both at once. The northern campaign had reached the point where military strategy no longer centered on conquering territory. It centered on finding bread, preserving retreat routes, and preventing total collapse.

The failure in Canada carried enormous consequences for the American Revolution. Had the colonies succeeded in taking and holding Canada, Britain would have lost a critical base for operations along the northern frontier and the St. Lawrence River.

Instead, the failed invasion ensured that Canada remained a strong British position throughout the war. From Canada, British forces would later launch major campaigns southward, including the Saratoga campaign of 1777 under John Burgoyne.

The failure also exposed serious weaknesses in the Continental Army: poor supply organization, short enlistments, inadequate medical preparation, and weak coordination between Congress and field commanders.

Yet even amid the crisis in Canada, the Revolution’s leaders were already thinking about the next phase of the war.

Far to the south at New York headquarters, General George Washington wrote Congress with a proposal that showed his growing sophistication in psychological warfare. Reports suggested that German troops were preparing to join the British Army in America. These soldiers, later collectively known as Hessians, though they came from several German states, were hired auxiliaries fighting for Britain rather than for their own national cause.

Washington believed that nationality and language might become weapons as useful as muskets and artillery.

Writing to John Hancock, Washington proposed recruiting “some Companies of our Germans” and placing “trusty, sensible fellows” where they could communicate directly with German soldiers serving Britain. His goal was to encourage “disaffection and desertion” among troops who might feel little loyalty to the British cause.

The idea reflected Washington’s understanding that wars were fought not only through battlefield victories but through morale, persuasion, and identity. Many German immigrants already lived in Pennsylvania and other colonies. Washington hoped shared language and culture could convince some of the incoming troops that Americans were not their enemies.

This moment on May 11, 1776, captured the Revolution in transition. In Canada, the Patriots faced retreat, hunger, sickness, and disappointment. The northern dream of expansion was collapsing. Yet elsewhere, American leaders were already adapting, experimenting with diplomacy, propaganda, and psychological strategy as they prepared for a much larger war that was only beginning.

For Franklin personally, the day marked one of the rare failures in a remarkable revolutionary career. But even in defeat, the Canadian mission taught lessons that shaped the Revolution moving forward.

The Americans learned that military occupation without stable supplies and local support could not succeed. They learned the devastating power of disease. They learned the limits of revolutionary enthusiasm across cultural boundaries. And they learned that Britain’s empire could not be dismantled quickly or easily.

As Franklin departed Montreal on the long journey back to Philadelphia, the Revolution itself was entering a darker and more dangerous stage, one where survival, not expansion, would become the central question.

substack.com
u/Jaykravetz — 11 days ago